FANDOM


  • Trailer 2 has landed!

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qppIQH_M-ms - there's brand new characters, brand new music!! ohmygosh, it looks AMAZING!!! i'm SO SO SO SO excited!! :D :D

    The Road Chip Official Trailer 1 (AU)

      Loading editor
    • Just one thing to say......


      WHERE..... ARE..... THE ..... GIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIRLS!!!!!!!!

      And ..... and why are their eyes like cartoons, and where is bella thorne? Wasn't she the one who Dave would date with? WHAT IS HAPPENING!!!!!!! Why do I have a horrible feeling suddenly?

        Loading editor
    • the girls made a cameo near the end of the trailer, but it was a clip from the squeakquel! o: also, i don't think bella is the girlfriend, i think kimberly williams-paisley is o: 

      as for their eyes, i'd say they look normal, like before :33 it's probs because it's a new film and we're not used to seeing new animation! oo:

        Loading editor
    • NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

        Loading editor
    • the third trailer will probably hold more information and proper animation for the film (i've noticed they've reused the 2007/2009 animation again for some scenes!), and maybe the girls will make a cameo in that :33 have to wait and see ^_^ 

        Loading editor
    • i love that alvin was holding up one of his TY plushies :D - also, i love that, in one of theo's scenes, we got to see the behind-the-scenes chipmunk stuffies laying on a "alvin and the chipmunks: sing 'n dance" box! :D sneaky little cameo there, hehe! :D :33

        Loading editor
    • Wow... I feel terrible. Are the girls in the movie? There are so many scenes in the movie, and the girls are not in there at all. Alvin says That is what it's all about. Just 4 dudes relaxing... so that means the girls are not anywhere close.

      I feel so sad I waited for this trailer so long, and the movie, and now I am disappointed.

      But it's just the trailer, I might still be wrong.

        Loading editor
    • the girls are officially confirmed to be in the film, otherwise their voice-actors wouldn't be listed on the official facebook page! :33

      but we don't know for sure if it's a whole-film appearance, or just a few cameo's here and there o: i think it's best to wait and find out in the third trailer, and the film itself ^-^ 

        Loading editor
    • Ohh dear... Samantha's son was the stepbrother they were about to gain?

      Oh noooo I thought that Samantha and Dave would have a baby!!! NO no no noooo he seems so annoying and terrible just like the boys in my school. Now it's worse than I thought It would be.

        Loading editor
    • the plot could thicken in the third trailer, same goes for myles' character :3 this is the first time we're seeing him, so our current impressions of him could change later on ^-^ 

        Loading editor
    • I don't know.... he seems the same typical annoying boy that I see everyday. I don't like it I feel terribly. Now I'm watching the trailer again trying to analyze it and to understand what the heck is happening.

        Loading editor
    • This trailer was... interesting. It gave us a bit more insight on Dave's new girlfriend and her son. Also, I really, really, really hope Baby Got Back isn't in the final film. That is, in my opinion, the worst song for the Chipmunks to cover. I also noticed that they included Conga in the background (orginally covered by The Chipettes, it's makes me wonder if they're reusing that song but with the Chipmunks).

        Loading editor
    • The girls are in the film somewhere, no need to worry.

      I'm thinking the "Conga" clip was just a little filler like "Kum Ba Ya." I was surprised to hear "Baby Got Back" in the trailer and have to agree. The song doesn't need to be covered by them.

      Was it just me or did The Chipmunks look a little grayer than usual?

        Loading editor
    • what do you mean by "a little grayer", if i may ask? oo: 

        Loading editor
    • They look as if they have a grayer contrast. That or I just haven't seen them in a long time.

        Loading editor
    • ah i understand now! :33 i think it may just be the fact that you haven't seen them in a while oo: 

        Loading editor
    • DEmersonJMFM wrote:
      I'm thinking the "Conga" clip was just a little filler like "Kum Ba Ya."

      Yeah, you're probably right. Although, it would be interesting to see them cover a song again from the previous film.

        Loading editor
    • i've noticed they're more fluffier than in the last 3! :33 

      Pic 1 , Pic 2 , Pic 3

        Loading editor
    • we speak no americano from the last movie is back this time being done by the Boys!

        Loading editor
    • ChirpyChipmunks wrote:
      i've noticed they're more fluffier than in the last 3! :33 

      Pic 1 , Pic 2 , Pic 3

      This isn't too surprising. It's been four years since the last movie, no doubt the Chipmunks would look better in this one. If you compare the first movie with the squeakquel, you'll also notice a difference in how their fur is animated. 

        Loading editor
    • I added the AU trailer to the original post as well.

      One of the main things about these trailers that is annoying me is that they use repeat scenes. Why use the same scene twice in the same trailer? And stop using clips from the other films. The second makes me wonder if they even have any new animation of the girls yet.

      Looking again, I really like their fluffier tails.

      I enjoyed that first shot of Tony Hale. Good laugh.

        Loading editor
    • Does anyone know what the song that plays from 0;42 to 0:47 is called? Is it Congo?

        Loading editor
    • it's congo, yep! :33 

        Loading editor
    • DEmersonJMFM
      DEmersonJMFM removed this reply because:
      Repeat.
      20:48, September 23, 2015
      This reply has been removed
    • Okay. I am now slightly concerned based on the trailer. The eyes look like animated like from the 2007 movi, and their CGI movie Chipmunks look slightly off because in some parts they look fine with the fur and all, then the next, they look like the Chipmunks were still in the computer making process. Why is that? That is just confusing. Can someone explain that to me please? Otherwise, this looks good.

        Loading editor
    • Somehow they now look more like squirrells than acutall chipmunks withthat greyish fur. 

        Loading editor
    • I don't see why everyone's complaining about the eyes. They've always been animated. They look the exact same as they always have! 

        Loading editor
    • As for the Girls! Maybe their hiding something about them in this film and that could explain their absanse from the trailers and only appearence so far being stock footage.

        Loading editor
    • Well, I really hope they are in the film and yes, I agree with DEmersonJMFM about re-using scenes from the last, let's say "trailer".

      The animation is definetely different and I love their fur. I didn't in the begging, but now I do.

      About their eyes... Well it's different, but it's totally something we'll get used to, so no need to worry about that anymore. And another thing. In the trailer, Dave's gf's name is Samantha, and in wikipedia it's says Shira. What her name anyway?

      What do you guys think about Samatha's, or Shira's son? I personally find him SUPER annoying and rude.

        Loading editor
      • Plus

      When is the next trailer coming out, or there is no gonna be another one at all?

        Loading editor
    • the next trailer will most likely be out in november, or december o:

        Loading editor
    • Aside from trailers, I'm also hoping for some film clips and behind the scenes featurettes of the movie. I hope those arrive very shortly. 

        Loading editor
    • Not sure how I feel about this... A couple of the clips make me feel un-easy about the "new-ish" look.

      Disregard this (you may discuss about this though)- It also looks like they're in a different house with the grey walls.

        Loading editor
    • Maybe they are in Samantha's house.

        Loading editor
    • Chiplover123 wrote:
      Maybe they are in Samantha's house.

      In the trailer Alvin says "new house," so no. But I'm still curious of why they moved.

        Loading editor
    • The colors are strange, and for sure the Chipettes are in the film a good amount i think this is a Chipmunk Adventure refernnce and maybe the Girls stay at the Chipmunks house to cover for them following Dave XD also their eyes are bigger! and they are also taller and weight more (MOST LIKEY CAUSE OF THE EXTRA FUR) and the colors of their fur is wayyy lighter soo yeah but the Chipettes are singing Shake it off XD . also its been confurmed the Chipettes are in it and also there is a rummor they may have new hair styles (maybe the new cartoon style) Since there connected 

        Loading editor
    • MelissaNthecrazyettes wrote:
      also there is a rummor they may have new hair styles (maybe the new cartoon style) Since there connected 

      No, they're not connected. The live action movies and 2015 series take place in different universes. 

        Loading editor
    • Heeha wrote:
      MelissaNthecrazyettes wrote:
      also there is a rummor they may have new hair styles (maybe the new cartoon style) Since there connected 
      No, they're not connected. The live action movies and 2015 series take place in different universes. 

      Not nessisarly, You have no prof of this. There is alot of signs pointing to it being conected. other than designs theres nothing that has been conredicted 

        Loading editor
    • IMusic.Wolf wrote:
      Chiplover123 wrote:
      Maybe they are in Samantha's house.
      In the trailer Alvin says "new house," so no. But I'm still curious of why they moved.

      most likey the new house in the Alvinn cartoon

        Loading editor
    • MelissaNthecrazyettes wrote:
      Heeha wrote:
      MelissaNthecrazyettes wrote:
      also there is a rummor they may have new hair styles (maybe the new cartoon style) Since there connected 
      No, they're not connected. The live action movies and 2015 series take place in different universes. 
      Not nessisarly, You have no prof of this. There is alot of signs pointing to it being conected. other than designs theres nothing that has been conredicted 

      It's obvious. The designs themselves are already enough to contradict the live action films. And there's than that by that. In one of the episodes, Simon states that the chipmunks stood on Dave's doorstep until he took them in. In the 2007 film, Dave let the chipmunks stay in because he wanted them to sing his songs. 

      In "Mojo Missing", Alvin has an increasingly hard time being without his hat. In the liver actions, Alvin has absoutely no problems without wearing his hat. In fact, he's only been seen with the darn thing one or two times. Very brief times at that. Furthermore, there are also differences in personalities. The characters don't act the same between the two continuities. They act similar enough to be recognizable as the same character, sure, but not completely the same. 

      These are key differences, making it very clear the two incarnations are seperate. 

        Loading editor
    • Heeha wrote:
      It's obvious. The designs themselves are already enough to contradict the live action films. And there's than that by that. In one of the episodes, Simon states that the chipmunks stood on Dave's doorstep until he took them in. In the 2007 film, Dave let the chipmunks stay in because he wanted them to sing his songs. 

      In "Mojo Missing", Alvin has an increasingly hard time being without his hat. In the liver actions, Alvin has absoutely no problems without wearing his hat. In fact, he's only been seen with the darn thing one or two times. Very brief times at that. Furthermore, there are also differences in personalities. The characters don't act the same between the two continuities. They act similar enough to be recognizable as the same character, sure, but not completely the same. 

      These are key differences, making it very clear the two incarnations are seperate. 

      Im not going to agure with you, But Designs were changed becuase it was mixed from the 80s and films for the fans. Designs change all the time. I mean there are alot of shows that change looks but are still conected. Also yes Simon does state this, but they did stand outside of his door for a while and they started singing. There were not about to leave so Dave finally let them in. Also again, the designs the way the ears look makes it hard for a hat. But he could wear it still you never know.  Also The movies only showed one side of their personalities in the films because of time limits but the show shows alot of sides so thats not fair to say since we have not seen the full film yet. Also there going to West Eastman High school in the new Series which is the same as the movies, And if you look at the clips from the 4th movie trailer when they saying "Were going to Miami" You see them in a new house and it looks like Dave's offlice from the tv show.

        Loading editor
    • Ok, the models for The Chipmunks look to be redone, because they look closer to the art on the Road Chip Junior Novel. I like the new models though; I actually like them better than what they were using. Also, Alvin's voice is off in some of the clips where he speaks it seems like maybe some of the voice clips are specifically for the trailer, hence they were done by someone else. I don't know for sure though.

        Loading editor
    • Rugratskid wrote:
      Ok, the models for The Chipmunks look to be redone, because they look closer to the art on the Road Chip Junior Novel. I like the new models though; I actually like them better than what they were using. Also, Alvin's voice is off in some of the clips where he speaks it seems like maybe some of the voice clips are specifically for the trailer, hence they were done by someone else. I don't know for sure though.

      Some voice clips are dubed and are not the actul voices. i guess they did not want to revele everything . but yeah its not real don't worry

        Loading editor
    • Aside from the girls, I see Tony Hale's character (Brendan Furman, was that his name?) seems 10 times as much of a threat as Ian ever was. 

      He's not a greedy record producer. He's an animal control officer of sorts. ANd that's far worse. Right?

      One more thing I hope i see current clips of the girls as well. I want to know what role they have. Maybe they secretly follow the boys. Why have Christina Applegate (Brittney), Anna Faris (Jeannette) and Kaley Coucu (Eleanor) with  only very few lines and cheracter development with their repsective coutnerparts. WHat role do the girls play? I hope more press and movie clips reveals more. We fans would love more romance between Chipmunk and Chipette and we know that's in the film somewhere.  

        Loading editor
    • I just saw the trailer and I loved it! The only thing I didn't like about it was the CGI animation. What happened to the CGI? They don't look anything like the previous 3 films, maybe they are still in post-production stage. I hope they are because even though the new animation is a pleasant surprise, it doesn't look good for them. But other than that, the trailer is awesome!

        Loading editor
    •  didn't expect the trailer to be so poor. The half scenes are from the last movies and the last trailer. Like... why did they even include old scenes??

      I can't seem to find the reason! Did they think that fans will not realise it, or they were just bored to make a proper trailer! I am dissapointed. 

      I was excited for the fourh movie because I wanted the romance!! 

        Loading editor
    • Chiplover123 wrote:
       didn't expect the trailer to be so poor. The half scenes are from the last movies and the last trailer. Like... why did they even include old scenes??

      Have you ever watched a movie trailer before? All trailers for the same movie are going to have at least one scene shared between all of them. When a new trailer comes out for a movie, rarely is it ever fully new material. That's just not how the movie business works. 

        Loading editor
    • I know that, but it's not just a scene that is shared between them!

        Loading editor
    • Chiplover123 wrote:
      I know that, but it's not just a scene that is shared between them!

      Yes, most movie trailers share quite a few scenes. I don't see why the trailer for Road Chip would be any different. 

        Loading editor
    • Well, I would like to see the girls and I know many people do too.

        Loading editor
    • I'm 100% sure the Chipettes are still going to be in the film. But, they're probably not going to have a big role in it, as the main focus will most likely to be about Dave and the Chipmunks.

        Loading editor
    • DJSponge wrote:
      I'm 100% sure the Chipettes are still going to be in the film. But, they're probably not going to have a big role in it, as the main focus will most likely to be about Dave and the Chipmunks.

      We fans just hope the girls aren't demoted with very few lines. That would dissappoint many Bagdasarian fans who were hoping for character development and romance from both parties. Not to mention finalle singing with both gorups. 

      I certainly hope the Chipettes to contribute just something to the plot--especialy compared to Chipwrecked

        Loading editor
    • They do have a spot in this movie, it was confurmed by a staff member of the 4th movie, i know alot more but can't tell. But The Chipettes are in the film so don't worry

        Loading editor
    • btw i found out that was the AU trailer not the USA trailer..

        Loading editor
    • MelissaNthecrazyettes wrote:
      btw i found out that was the AU trailer not the USA trailer..

      Huh? I don't undersatnd. Austrailia trailer? THen where's the 'real' US trailer?


        Loading editor
    • Ngh93 wrote:
      MelissaNthecrazyettes wrote:
      btw i found out that was the AU trailer not the USA trailer..
      Huh? I don't undersatnd. Austrailia trailer? THen where's the 'real' US trailer?


      there is no 2nd US trailer, i checked the channel :/ its strange i can send you a link if you want

        Loading editor
    • MelissaNthecrazyettes wrote:
      there is no 2nd US trailer, i checked the channel :/ its strange i can send you a link if you want

      No second US trailer? WIth only about three months till release? unbelievable.

      Perhaps you can send me that link. I'll take a peek. 

        Loading editor
    • Ngh93 wrote:
      No second US trailer? WIth only about three months till release? unbelievable.

      Perhaps you can send me that link. I'll take a peek. 

      Ok so heres the US fox channel, which is linked in Alvinmovies.com 

      https://www.youtube.com/user/foxmovies

      If you look on this channel you will see theres no trailer besides the 1st trailer, which is not even on there! its on the channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCNDaFXLGF7W6ADJ7eUwIhgg

      and even on there there is no 2nd trailer. The trailer got uploaded to this channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC1AJxP0vC_yqPUtr2MQttRQ

      Which is clearly differnt that would explain why it says the 26ths because thats when AU is getting it as shown in this link below!

      [[1]]

        Loading editor
    • So it seems that is indeed a trailer for Australia (based off the "About" tab on the Youtube account the video's on). I seen the different date but just assumed they were thinking of changing the premiere. I guess I'll have to look a little closer next time. Regardless, a new trailer is a new trailer.

        Loading editor
    • so when do you think the real new US traielr will come? (along with featurettes, film clips)?

        Loading editor
    • DEmersonJMFM wrote:
      So it seems that is indeed a trailer for Australia. I seen the different date but just assumed they were thinking of changing the premiere. I guess I'll have to look a little closer next time. Regardless, a new trailer is a new trailer.

      Yeah, i thought the same at 1st as well, but then i looked closer, i know its still a trailer but i figured everyone would want the correct info. On this since this is a site with offical and correct news. But still the trailer is great! And Ngh93 most likey soon because the film comes out the 23th in the US so we will most likey get a trailer soon.

        Loading editor
    • But why would they show us the Australian trailer, and not the official? Maybe it's still in the process. Maybe, it'll include the girls as well!

        Loading editor
    • Chiplover123 wrote:
      But why would they show us the Australian trailer, and not the official?

      The Australian trailer is an official trailer but was meant for Australia as it was shown on an Australian Youtube channel. There's no indication within the trailer itself to hint who it was meant for.

        Loading editor
    • Oh, okay.

        Loading editor
    • Any film clips, behind the scenes featurettes coming soon? It might expand the roles of both groups. Maybe even a third trailer that expands the role of the girls? 

        Loading editor
    • If you're asking, ......no... we have nothing and that makes me really upset with Janice and whoever does this.

        Loading editor
    • Dang! We should be getting featurettes and clips by now. And the movie's coming in DECEMBER. And we don't have a full explainable trailer for US, no filmclips or even featurettes. 

      Ross and Janice gave us plenty of clips for the previous films before their release. What is preventing them from doing this one?! 

      (
        Loading editor
    • the film may still be in post-production (eg; the animation for the chipmunks (and chipettes) may still be in progress, seeing as they've reused scenes from the previous films as a filler for some of the road chip scenes!) oo: 

      the next trailer could possibly be published in november or december, like the previous films trailers did :33 

        Loading editor
    • So we wait for the trailers,  we wait for the new Alvinnn episodes and for the movie.... we wait... and wait....................................... aaaaaaand wait.

        Loading editor
    • If I may add, It's not just the trailers we're desperate to be publsihed for it's also film clips and behind the scenes featurettes. 

        Loading editor
    • i know :33 i'm just saying, the film may still be in post-production - meaning some animation scenes may still be in progress ^^;; (gotta do all the fur, tiny details and textures, etc!)

        Loading editor
    • This whole movie and animation thing makes me release how impatience I am. I feel terrible :P

      Sorry guys if I make you feel mad with my impatience ;(

        Loading editor
    • Something i"m still worried about 

      It's nearly November and we still don't know nothing else about the movie. Not as much as a movie clip or behind the scense featurette (that would explain a lot of details that the convuluated UK/AUS trailer isn't telling us--and they aren't even spoilers). ANd Just when I thought there was a REAL US trailer or even tv spots or movie clips, they still haven't shown. WHat else is there to the plot besides the Marraige prevention? WHat role do the Chipettes play now that we KNOW that they ARE appearing (just contriute something to the plot--especiallyu compared to Chipwrecked). What we need is tv spots, film clips and behind the scenes featurettes. Cause I know there is more to this plot than the marraige prevention.

      Anything regarding the news about Road CHip the marketign's doing a TERRIBLE job with only two trailers. 

        Loading editor
    • Final trailers, clips, TV spots, and featurettes usually start showing up a few weeks before release.

      So we should expect something by late November.

        Loading editor
    • But that is terrible! If you compare it to Kung Fu Panda 3, the trailer was out months ago and the movie will be out the NEXT YEAR!!!! SHAME ON THEM!

        Loading editor
    • Chiplover123 wrote:
      But that is terrible! If you compare it to Kung Fu Panda 3, the trailer was out months ago and the movie will be out the NEXT YEAR!!!! SHAME ON THEM!

      Movies companies work differently. That's DreamWorks Animation and this is 20th Century Fox. So we should always expect differences in marketing between these two.

        Loading editor
    • DJSponge wrote:
      Chiplover123 wrote:
      But that is terrible! If you compare it to Kung Fu Panda 3, the trailer was out months ago and the movie will be out the NEXT YEAR!!!! SHAME ON THEM!
      Movies companies work differently. That's DreamWorks Animation and this is 20th Century Fox. So we should always expect differences in marketing between these two.

      But Fox now owns Dreamworks animation through distributions since 2013 so both KFP & ALvin shuld have had a fair amount of trailers months before the release should work the same.  

        Loading editor
    •   Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
Give Kudos to this message
You've given this message Kudos!
See who gave Kudos to this message
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.