FANDOM


  • DEmersonJMFM
    DEmersonJMFM closed this thread because:
    Reached the 500 post limit.
    15:28, July 26, 2016

    A great deal of fan fiction was going on about this topic, and many actually believed what was being said. Chipmunks in space? I couldn't imagine that as a possibility. But nevertheless, Fox has included a fourth CGI/live-action film on their release schedule. No other details are known at this point. What do you think of a new CGI film and what do you expect from it?

    Main article: Alvin and the Chipmunks: The Road Chip

    To talk about posters, here or here.
    To talk about trailers, click here.
    To talk about the soundtrack, click here.

    To talk about merchandise, click here.
    To review the film, click here.

      Loading editor
    • Hmmm, the new CGI... in accordance with the tradition previously set with the chipmunks I would expect more romance developed for Alvin and Brittany... as for a topic for a film... probably Dave getting married. Seems to be a pretty common thing they like to throw in the Chipmunk stories. I would love to see something WAY out there like a murder or a western, but lets face it, the chipmunks tend to live only in the comedy realm, not mystery or drama. I would also like a CGI explanation for where the Chipettes came from. I guess there is a possibility for it being on the moon but I doubt it, given most moon movies do really terribly in the box office.

        Loading editor
    • Haha, a CGI Chipmunk western! I would love to see that. Oh, the two groups could be two sets of outlaws in different parts of the west that ultimately meet in an all out brawl. Or try and defeat a giant mechanical spider (yes, there's a reference).

      They sortof explained where they came from in the second but not really. I do hope though given the amount of time before it is released that this film will be the best one so far.

        Loading editor
    • Well see, I'm pretty sure the reason this one has taken so long is because of the ongoing court battle that the Bagdasarians are in with various television companies. :/

        Loading editor
    • When have they not been in court the last decade. There seems to always be an issue with someone.

        Loading editor
    • Thats what happens when you have an older entertainment company, there is a reason you don't see any more Hanna-Barbara cartoons and there are few MGM films that actually make it to the box office. Older companies have a pretty rough go of it because everyone wants a piece of the legacy.

      Eietherways, I will look forward to the next chipmunk movie (even if I still wish it was in cartoon, or even JUST CGI. [rant over]). I guess its up for discussion as to what the next one will be. :)

        Loading editor
    • I still want that Western though :p

        Loading editor
    • That would be pretty awesome! :)

        Loading editor
    • I know you guys have not responded in a while here, but IMDb states that Jenny Slate may return as Zoe.

        Loading editor
    • That's okay, jump into any discussion at any time since the time between the last post and new posts doesn't matter here. Now for the return of Zoe: it makes some sense that she might return, however, IMDb isn't always reliable. It makes a good discussion point though. Some people might be happy for her return, but I for one, and I know a few others, would rather not see her again. I'm not a big fan of her personality; maybe it was all of those spider bites.

        Loading editor
    • Yeah, same here. I would rather they put in a new villain, possibly another chipmunk, or Ryan could pop in and return.

        Loading editor
    • Yes, someone new is needed. The same happened with a discussion in the fan base about Ian. Most were okay that he returned in the second film but by the time of the third, they were tired of him. I'm not a big fan of Ryan either. They could introduce Uncle Harry, though that might upset to some degree the 80s fans (I know SJ4evr really doesn't like him).

      The CGI films need to be refreshed, something different and better written. It bugs me that the films keep receiving worse and worse ratings, making the whole franchise look bad. I hope the fourth movie is first of all, the last one and secondly, the best of them all. They need a great wrap to get people interested in the new series and the entire franchise even more.

        Loading editor
    • i would expect simon and jeanette to be offically dating and alvin and brittany to go on a date. maybe alvin will munk up and tell his feelings to her. and i want theodore and eleanor to have a relasonship. btw exuse my spelling . also maybe make a new girl chipette like charlen to get brittany jelous and then she would tell alvin she likes him and dave gets back with his ex.

        Loading editor
    • is it gonna be imunk or cgi?

        Loading editor
    • PencilDJ12 wrote:
      is it gonna be imunk or cgi?

      That's a great question and I can't give an answer for certain. Since it's the fourth movie in a series of CGI/Live-action, I would say it would stay CGI. However, the series appears like it will begin airing before the film so it's still possible that it could be the iMunk design.

        Loading editor
    • they need to stay with the normal design . i like the movie design . the imunk design just doest fit them. it makes them look like a disney junor cartoon in my opinon

        Loading editor
    • I'd stray away from saying the "normal design." What is the normal? There is no "normal" to the character designs since they have changed multiple times.

        Loading editor
    • Based on some new released information I can say that unfortunately (maybe not for all) the fourth movie has been moved back a little over a year. I have not found any information to confirm why the release date was moved by so much, but I think it might be as a result of the development of the new series and/or completion with other films scheduled to be released in 2015. Visit the article page for more info.

        Loading editor
    • Not sure if this is the official poster, but I found this. 

      File:Alvin and the Chipmunks 4 New Poster (?) - 2016

        Loading editor
    • Yep, I'm pretty sure it's real. Maybe not the official poster for the film though I had put it on the article page anyway.

        Loading editor
    • Thanks

        Loading editor
    • They go to make a movie. It real.

        Loading editor
    • thats good

        Loading editor
    • Will all just walt & see

        Loading editor
    • ya :)

        Loading editor
    • Check out the multiple recent updates here.

      Edit: I checked out some of the movies the new director directed and I'm a little bummed at the ratings for them.

        Loading editor
    • uh oh, Thats not good and kk

        Loading editor
    • I believed that it would be an introduction to the series but it is impossible because the series will be release first.

        Loading editor
    • I'm really excited they're making a fourth film. I loved the previous three films and I can't wait to see what kind of wacky hijinks the chipmunks go through in the fourth film. I just really hope this one doesn't recieve negative reviews. Literally all of the live action/CGI films have recieved negative reviews so far and it makes me embarrassed to talk about how much I love the films around other people. It'd be great if the fourth film could get positive reviews for once or even just mixed. It'd prove that the films aren't as bad as everyone says they are. But I doubt it, I found Chipwrecked to be hilariously enteratining and it managed to make me feel sad but it got negative reviews with people calling it "just another silly chipmunk movie with no effort put in it". 

        Loading editor
    • Heeha wrote:
      I'm really excited they're making a fourth film. I loved the previous three films and I can't wait to see what kind of wacky hijinks the chipmunks go through in the fourth film. I just really hope this one doesn't recieve negative reviews. Literally all of the live action/CGI films have recieved negative reviews so far and it makes me embarrassed to talk about how much I love the films around other people. It'd be great if the fourth film could get positive reviews for once or even just mixed. It'd prove that the films aren't as bad as everyone says they are. But I doubt it, I found Chipwrecked to be hilariously enteratining and it managed to make me feel sad but it got negative reviews with people calling it "just another silly chipmunk movie with no effort put in it". 

      Quite a few people considered the first film "the best" but critics gave it a very low rating. The second and third had about the same or lower. I'm not going to expect different from them regardless of whether it is better or not. I've always considered critics poor judges as I've liked many films they've disliked. Sure many positive reviews would be awesome, but I think a number of the critics just don't like the chipmunks and/or their realistic CGI versions.

        Loading editor
    • Heeha wrote:
      I'm really excited they're making a fourth film. I loved the previous three films and I can't wait to see what kind of wacky hijinks the chipmunks go through in the fourth film. I just really hope this one doesn't recieve negative reviews. Literally all of the live action/CGI films have recieved negative reviews so far and it makes me embarrassed to talk about how much I love the films around other people. It'd be great if the fourth film could get positive reviews for once or even just mixed. It'd prove that the films aren't as bad as everyone says they are. But I doubt it, I found Chipwrecked to be hilariously enteratining and it managed to make me feel sad but it got negative reviews with people calling it "just another silly chipmunk movie with no effort put in it". 

      You are not the only one who loved CGI's movies. I loved too. 

        Loading editor
    • DEmersonJMFM wrote:
      Quite a few people considered the first film "the best" but critics gave it a very low rating. The second and third had about the same or lower. I'm not going to expect different from them regardless of whether it is better or not. I've always considered critics poor judges as I've liked many films they've disliked. Sure many positive reviews would be awesome, but I think a number of the critics just don't like the chipmunks and/or their realistic CGI versions.

      I actually though the third movie was the best. I was more emotionally connected to the chcaracters and it had more emotion. The first film is my second favorite because it showed up how the chipmunks met Dave and I really liked the whole Ian storyline as it shows you that money isn't eveything. I liked the second movie the least because it felt kind of like a rehash of the first movie and I wasn't a big fan replacing Dave with Toby. I also don't get all the hat eon the chipmunks' film designs. Lots of people say they're ugly but I actually think they're really adorable. Especially Alvin. 

        Loading editor
    • Heeha wrote:

      I actually though the third movie was the best. I was more emotionally connected to the chcaracters and it had more emotion. The first film is my second favorite because it showed up how the chipmunks met Dave and I really liked the whole Ian storyline as it shows you that money isn't eveything. I liked the second movie the least because it felt kind of like a rehash of the first movie and I wasn't a big fan replacing Dave with Toby. I also don't get all the hat eon the chipmunks' film designs. Lots of people say they're ugly but I actually think they're really adorable. Especially Alvin. 

      We're getting a little off topic. Let's try to stick with the fourth film on this thread. Favorite film can be discussed here, but I mostly agree.

        Loading editor
    • DEmersonJMFM wrote:
      We're getting a little off topic. Let's try to stick with the fourth film on this thread. Favorite film can be discussed here, but I mostly agree.

      Alright then. Back to the fourth film, do we have any idea what the chipmunks will look like? I'm assuming they're gonna look like how they did in the previous films but I'm wondering if they're change them slightly to make them look more like how they appear in the upcoming CGI series?

        Loading editor
    • This is the burning question. I'm willing to bet that they will be the same as the rest of the CGI/live-action films because 1) they are connected and 2) yet another design in a short time is sure to confuse and/or irritate/annoy people. We did have one image from a licensing convention (the broken link above) showing them unchanged in terms of their design but was deleted when the release date changed once again. This was an early image; some change is nevertheless possible however unlikely.

        Loading editor
    • I saw the image but I thought maybe their designs changed because it's not on the page anymore. Since it hasn't been confirmed that the voice actors for the previous films are coming back, I wonder if there's any chance of the voice actors for the CGI series voicing the characters instead. 

        Loading editor
    • This ties a little with the same reason I don't think their designs will change. Changing voice actors might not be a great idea if it can be avoided as their voices will be a little different (despite them being different for the series). Consistency within a project (connected films, series, etc.) is best if you can help it.

        Loading editor
    • I agree, I was just thinking that if one of the voice actors for the previous films was unavailable, they might use one of the voice actors from the series to replace them. 

        Loading editor
    • well it has been confurmed to be called Road Chip.... strangly enogh my friend made up that name... they must be really watching fans now.

        Loading editor
    • I doubt that they got the "Road Chip" part from any of the fans. All of the sequels have had puns so far and since they're going on a road trip, that's the obvious way to go. 

        Loading editor
    • The film is currently set to premiere about a week after the premiere of a highly anticipated Star Wars film. Do you think this will be pretty devastating to the fourth movie or do you think Road Chip can hold its own?

        Loading editor
    • It's set to come out this December, and yet there has been no production done yet? That seems kinda odd... are most movies produced in less than 12 months? I thought it was 12 months or sometimes a little more... honestly, I'm not sure if the movie will hold up at any release date. A lot of peoeple disliked the third one; honestly, I don't think fans of the 60's-90's Chipmunks liked any of the CGI movies. I'm not saying all of them hated it, but the ones I have seen didn't like it. If there's a large younger audience, they will make a good amount of money, but otherwise, I doubt they will make as much as they expect (what it is they are expecting to make).

        Loading editor
    • I haven't heard any production yet. I believe they are just on the edge as a few weeks ago they sent out a request to hire crew for the film. I would say that the script has been written.

      Personally, I liked the third film the most. I think 80s fans in general (not exclusively) disliked the new films because they were CGI and not animated (others would say personality/size differences). This was likely the major "flaw." It is true though that the third got the worst reviews (not like critics gave any of them good reviews anyway) and made the least at the box office worldwide (about $20 million less than the first) so I was very surprised to hear of a fourth film.

      As for it's success; so so. Star Wars will take some, if not most, of the older (teen) viewers. This, however, might be offset by the success (hopefully) of the new series. I'm willing to predict that worldwide box office will be $300 to $330 million, which is less but still a serious amount of cash.

        Loading editor
    • I'm a complete 80's fan, but I saw Chipwrecked twice on the big screen and it remains my favourite of the Live Action movies - I think it's a personality thing, because there's honestly some shifty animation in the 80's that I don't like (I know it was low-budget but still), and Alvin's character development in Chipwrecked was really well done. Personally, I think it's a game of content for me. There's more of my favourite characters to look at in the 80's era, so I keep going back to it rather than watching three movies over and over. 

      Long story short: I don't really mind what they look like or which era I prefer, I'm gonna go see that movie because I love the characters and their dynamic. If anyone else feels that way, the 4th movie will be a success like the last three were (box-office-wise and hopefully critic-wise, too, finally).

      As for the news on the 4th movie, I know this time 2011 I was fanatically collecting however many trailers there were for Chipwrecked by now. I have a feeling it won't release this year, but I could be wrong... 

        Loading editor
    • I haven't hated any of these movies yet.. actually, I have very fond memories retaining to The Squeakquel. I always saw the commercials on TV, I had the soundtrack, the beanie babies, and other things I'm probably forgetting. I saw it on Christmas Day in 2009, and loved it. A lot of people seem to dislike the new movies because they're not how they were in the 80's. But it's not the 80's anymore, and things change. If things never changed, we would still have the realistic designs from the late 50's. Hopefully, the new movie is good. I will end up seeing it, regardless of how the trailers make it look.  

        Loading editor
    • DEmersonJMFM wrote:
      The film is currently set to premiere about a week after the premiere of a highly anticipated Star Wars film. Do you think this will be pretty devastating to the fourth movie or do you think Road Chip can hold its own?

      Pft, who cares about Star Wars when you've got Alvin and the Chipmunks? 

        Loading editor
    • Heeha wrote:

      Pft, who cares about Star Wars when you've got Alvin and the Chipmunks? 

      I'm not a Star Wars fan, but I'm hearing many people stating it's a mistake to premiere a film a week or two directing following. We'll find out when the time comes.

        Loading editor
    • DEmersonJMFM wrote:
      Heeha wrote:

      Pft, who cares about Star Wars when you've got Alvin and the Chipmunks? 

      I'm not a Star Wars fan, but I'm hearing many people stating it's a mistake to premiere a film a week or two directing following. We'll find out when the time comes.

      Did the previous three films have any competition when they debuted at the theater? I can't remember. 

        Loading editor
    • The Squeakquel had Avatar a week before (and the second film grossed the most of the films). The first and third didn't have anything sticking out to me at least. My initial thought that perhaps a popular film before could actually help but anything's possible.

        Loading editor
    • A few Sites i seen are saying possibliy in releceing in 2017 which OMG i hope that does not happen!

        Loading editor
    • Plot summary added. Sounds like it has the potential to be very ineresting.

        Loading editor
    • 4! a 4 one? yay

        Loading editor
    • The plot seems interesting enough to make me want to see it in theaters. It kinda sucks that it won't be Claire as Dave's girlfriend in this movie. Was she in the first movie for nothing?

      Plus, I just realized SJ4evr's first post on this thread predicting the movie's plot turned out to be true!

        Loading editor
    • DJSponge wrote:

      It kinda sucks that it won't be Claire as Dave's girlfriend in this movie.

      Plus, I just realized SJ4evr's first post on this thread predicting the movie's plot turned out to be true!

      Haha! You're right. I wish she was still around though to give more of her thoughts. I still wouldn't mind my Western idea :p

      As for Claire, I think she was always meant to be a one time character. Of course they left her plot wild open, just like Toby and Julie.

        Loading editor
    • Who says the girlfriend isn't Claire..? Can't rule that out immediately :p

      I'm actually really liking the new plot - it's simple, which means they don't have to focus so much on telling and they can do more showing. Also has room for lots of character development, with seeing how they all react to the confusing situation.

        Loading editor
    • GinEnglish96 wrote:
      Who says the girlfriend isn't Claire..? Can't rule that out immediately :p

      Well, they said "new" girlfriend. It's slightly possible it's Claire, but not promising.

        Loading editor
    • I just read the plot, and it sounds great. However, the movie will probably be bumped up to 2016, since as far as we know, filming hasn't even started. I would be happy with a 2015 release, but I kinda doubt it. Honestly, since that plot isn't any sort of official release from FOX or Badgasarian, it could be Claire. The whole "new girlfriend" part could have been a misunderstanding between whoever originally said the plot and whoever posted it. It's possible it's a different girl though; in that case, we better get some sort of story with her, and not just start the movie right around the 3 day mark (before the proposal).

        Loading editor
    • Rugratskid wrote:
      I just read the plot, and it sounds great. However, the movie will probably be bumped up to 2016, since as far as we know, filming hasn't even started. I would be happy with a 2015 release, but I kinda doubt it. 

      I agree, this time 2011 there was a lot of hype going on for the 3rd movie.

        Loading editor
    • Rugratskid wrote:
      However, the movie will probably be bumped up to 2016, since as far as we know, filming hasn't even started. I would be happy with a 2015 release, but I kinda doubt it.

      I've been reading news articles (the film's villain has been cast, Dave, and The Chipmunks should retain the same voices) and they apparently cannot decide if the movie will premiere Dec. 23, 2015, Dec. 25, 2015, or Dec. 16, 2016. I do think the movie will once again be bumped back to 2016 though, but anything's possible.

        Loading editor
    • Rugratskid wrote:
      I just read the plot, and it sounds great. However, the movie will probably be bumped up to 2016, since as far as we know, filming hasn't even started. I would be happy with a 2015 release, but I kinda doubt it. Honestly, since that plot isn't any sort of official release from FOX or Badgasarian, it could be Claire. The whole "new girlfriend" part could have been a misunderstanding between whoever originally said the plot and whoever posted it. It's possible it's a different girl though; in that case, we better get some sort of story with her, and not just start the movie right around the 3 day mark (before the proposal).

      I agree 99 + 1 you do the Math 

        Loading editor
    • Eight?

        Loading editor
    • Heeha wrote:
      Eight?

      Silly Heeha 99+1=100 lol

        Loading editor
    • Pinkyrue wrote:
      Heeha wrote:
      Eight?
      Silly Heeha 99+1=100 lol

      Oh...I hope my math teacher doesn't read this thread. 

        Loading editor
    • DEmersonJMFM
      DEmersonJMFM removed this reply because:
      Off-topic.
      13:32, February 12, 2015
      This reply has been removed
    • Let's stay on topic please.

        Loading editor
    • ok will do!

        Loading editor
    • I just pray for the Chipettes to return as well. Please. I can't stand a sequel without them. I'm getting worried. THey have to appear eve nif Janice has to dub them in place of Christina Anna and Amy. The chipettes MUST appear. I don't care if Ian Hawke doesn't appear but the Chipettes HAVE to appear. Please confirm that they'r eappearing before the trailer comes 

        Loading editor
    • Ngh93 wrote:
      I just pray for the Chipettes to return as well. Please. I can't stand a sequel without them. I'm getting worried. THey have to appear eve nif Janice has to dub them in place of Christina Anna and Amy. The chipettes MUST appear. I don't care if Ian Hawke doesn't appear but the Chipettes HAVE to appear. Please confirm that they'r eappearing before the trailer comes 

      I hope the Chipettes apear as well.. but being that in the new tv series the Chipettes don't live with The Chipmunks anymore its possible they may not be a big part of the film. Although im not sure if the cartoon is conected or not. But were all hopeing to see the return of The Chipettes and im sure Christina, Anna and Amy will voice them if there in the film.

        Loading editor
    • Um, the TV series and films aren't in the same continuity. Whatever happens in the TV series has no effect on the films and vice versa. The designs alone are enough to tell you they're not in thre same continuity. 

        Loading editor
    • Well the film continutity will be broken if the chipettes don't appear in the 4th film. They appeared in the sequel as abandoned in a fedex box. Miss Miller doesn't exist in the live action films. I Just can't stand a sequel without Brittany Jeanette & Eleanor. They were making fantastic relationshjps. I am desperate  for the chippettes to appear. And I think i'll have a heart attack if they don't So either Christina Anna & Amy Return or Janice will have to fill for them. Or pospone the film by a year or 2. 

      I don't mean to sound threatening. I"m just increasingly desperate for Brittany Jeannete and Eleanor to return. Any fan would feel the same way I do. 

        Loading editor
    • I don't believe The Chipettes won't apeer in forth movie, that just does not make any sense, and I think the story won't be the same without them. They must be in the movie.

        Loading editor
    • Heeha wrote:
      Um, the TV series and films aren't in the same continuity. Whatever happens in the TV series has no effect on the films and vice versa. The designs alone are enough to tell you they're not in thre same continuity. 

      just because the designs change does not always mean they can't be connected...and then this would mean a remeeting of The Chipettes and the Chipmunks backstory retold... who knows, but as for the 4th film it looks like no Chipettes :(

        Loading editor

    • MelissaNthecrazyettes wrote:

      Heeha wrote:
      Um, the TV series and films aren't in the same continuity. Whatever happens in the TV series has no effect on the films and vice versa. The designs alone are enough to tell you they're not in thre same continuity. 
      just because the designs change does not always mean they can't be connected...and then this would mean a remeeting of The Chipettes and the Chipmunks backstory retold... who knows, but as for the 4th film it looks like no Chipettes :(

      No. THe chipettes HAVE to appear. It'd make no sense if they didn't appear in the fourth movie. There is no continuity if they don't appear in road chip. I am desperate for the girls to appear even if Janice has to cover for Amy Christina and Anna for them. otherwise I'd like the 4th movie postponed a year. I CANNOT stand a sequel without Brittany Jeannette and Eleanor. And I don't think I'll ever accept that. Please make the chipettes appear (sob) :'(

        Loading editor
    • Ngh93 wrote:

      No. THe chipettes HAVE to appear. It'd make no sense if they didn't appear in the fourth movie. There is no continuity if they don't appear in road chip. I am desperate for the girls to appear even if Janice has to cover for Amy Christina and Anna for them. otherwise I'd like the 4th movie postponed a year. I CANNOT stand a sequel without Brittany Jeannette and Eleanor. And I don't think I'll ever accept that. 

      This is basically a repeat of what you posted above and is beginning to turn into what happened in the thread I closed before about you ranting. This is your last warning about this topic. Don't make this overly personal or keep repeating yourself. As stated before, The Chipettes are not confirmed to appear or not appear. Regardless, they don't have to appear. They are not in every film/episode/song etc and your pleads aren't going to magically change that.

        Loading editor
    • Ngh93 wrote:


      MelissaNthecrazyettes wrote:

      Heeha wrote:
      Um, the TV series and films aren't in the same continuity. Whatever happens in the TV series has no effect on the films and vice versa. The designs alone are enough to tell you they're not in thre same continuity. 
      just because the designs change does not always mean they can't be connected...and then this would mean a remeeting of The Chipettes and the Chipmunks backstory retold... who knows, but as for the 4th film it looks like no Chipettes :(
      No. THe chipettes HAVE to appear. It'd make no sense if they didn't appear in the fourth movie. There is no continuity if they don't appear in road chip. I am desperate for the girls to appear even if Janice has to cover for Amy Christina and Anna for them. otherwise I'd like the 4th movie postponed a year. I CANNOT stand a sequel without Brittany Jeannette and Eleanor. And I don't think I'll ever accept that. 

      calm down,The Chipettes may play a minor role in the film, but as far as i can tell there not a big part of this film. I would not worry much though

        Loading editor
    • MelissaNthecrazyettes wrote:
      Heeha wrote:
      Um, the TV series and films aren't in the same continuity. Whatever happens in the TV series has no effect on the films and vice versa. The designs alone are enough to tell you they're not in thre same continuity. 
      just because the designs change does not always mean they can't be connected...and then this would mean a remeeting of The Chipettes and the Chipmunks backstory retold... who knows, but as for the 4th film it looks like no Chipettes :(

      You don't seem to understand. While a design change doesn't nessicarily mean they're not connected, these design changes do. It's too big of a change. One that contradicts the movies. If they were connected, the designs would've been a lot closer to the movies. While I can understand maybe simplifying their fur as a design change, they've changed way too much for them to be considered connected. First of all, they've changed the characters ' eye colors. Not to mention giving them different clothes. 

      The chipmunks in the films are meant to be more realistic and therefore don't wear much clothes, just hoodies. However, here they have more clothes than ever, not to mention looking a ton more human like. 

        Loading editor
    • Heeha wrote:
      You don't seem to understand. While a design change doesn't nessicarily mean they're not connected, these design changes do. It's too big of a change. One that contradicts the movies. If they were connected, the designs would've been a lot closer to the movies. While I can understand maybe simplifying their fur as a design change, they've changed way too much for them to be considered connected. First of all, they've changed the characters ' eye colors. Not to mention giving them different clothes. 

      Exactly!

      And it's not even about the designs, guys. The Chipettes don't live with Dave in the new series, they live in a treehouse, Miss Miller is a character there, and they're probably not in high school either (just judging by the students' voices). The films have no connection to the series, regarding the way the characters live, let alone the drastic design change.

        Loading editor
    • GinEnglish96 wrote:
      Heeha wrote:
      You don't seem to understand. While a design change doesn't nessicarily mean they're not connected, these design changes do. It's too big of a change. One that contradicts the movies. If they were connected, the designs would've been a lot closer to the movies. While I can understand maybe simplifying their fur as a design change, they've changed way too much for them to be considered connected. First of all, they've changed the characters ' eye colors. Not to mention giving them different clothes. 
      Exactly!

      And it's not even about the designs, guys. The Chipettes don't live with Dave in the new series, they live in a treehouse, Miss Miller is a character there, and they're probably not in high school either (just judging by the students' voices). The films have no connection to the series, regarding the way the characters live, let alone the drastic design change.

      maybe so. But they do look to be in Middle School or High school due to the students being older and looking like teems, But i guess i see your point. Also the Chipettes could not live with Dave in the 4th film.. i mean even in Chipwrecked it never said they were living with Dave. Also the 2nd film Alvin said "I told them they could stay with us as long as they needed to" Meaning stay for a while, not forever..

        Loading editor
    • MelissaNthecrazyettes wrote:
      GinEnglish96 wrote:
      Heeha wrote:
      You don't seem to understand. While a design change doesn't nessicarily mean they're not connected, these design changes do. It's too big of a change. One that contradicts the movies. If they were connected, the designs would've been a lot closer to the movies. While I can understand maybe simplifying their fur as a design change, they've changed way too much for them to be considered connected. First of all, they've changed the characters ' eye colors. Not to mention giving them different clothes. 
      Exactly!

      And it's not even about the designs, guys. The Chipettes don't live with Dave in the new series, they live in a treehouse, Miss Miller is a character there, and they're probably not in high school either (just judging by the students' voices). The films have no connection to the series, regarding the way the characters live, let alone the drastic design change.

      maybe so. But they do look to be in Middle School or High school due to the students being older and looking like teems, But i guess i see your point. Also the Chipettes could not live with Dave in the 4th film.. i mean even in Chipwrecked it never said they were living with Dave. Also the 2nd film Alvin said "I told them they could stay with us as long as they needed to" Meaning stay for a while, not forever..

      Yes they do live with Dave they got thier own beds and go with the boys everywhere they go. If not, then WHERE DO Brittany, Jeanette & Eleanor live if Miss MIller doesn't exist in the live films?--There is no mention of that crazy lady in any of the films.  WHere DO the girls live in the live action films if it's not with Dave? That just makes no sense whatsoever.

        Loading editor
    • Ngh93 wrote:
      Yes they do live with Dave they got thier own beds and go with the boys everywhere they go. If not, then WHERE DO Brittany, Jeanette & Eleanor live if Miss MIller doesn't exist in the live films?--There is no mention of that crazy lady in any of the films.  WHere DO the girls live in the live action films if it's not with Dave? That just makes no sense whatsoever.

      It does not state in Chipwrecked they still live there the Chipettes could of moved out.. in the 2nd movie they did.. But you don't see this in the 3rd film. Also just cause they went with the boys does not mean they are still living with each other, but they are under Dave's care.

        Loading editor
    • But the iflm  says it follolws Chipwrecked. Well that is incorrect. It cannot possibly be a followup of Chipwrecked without the girls. Every sequel introfuced caharacter has always appeared in the next sequel of the franchise. 

        Loading editor
    • Ngh93 wrote:
      But the iflm  says it follolws Chipwrecked. Well that is incorrect. It cannot possibly be a followup of Chipwrecked without the girls. Every sequel introfuced caharacter has always appeared in the next sequel of the franchise. 

      They do not have to be in the 4th one.. It would be nice though

        Loading editor
    • Nice? It'd be a RELIEF! THe entire fanbase is getting anxious over Britney, Jeannette & Eleanor's status. 

      Sorry don't mean to sound personal 

        Loading editor
    • Ngh93 wrote:
      Nice? It'd be a RELIEF! THe entire fanbase is getting anxious over Britney, Jeannette & Eleanor's status. 

      Sorry don't mean to sound personal 

      i will be very disapointed if there not in the film but talking about it won't change anything... They have not been confurmed to be in the next one yet we will just have to simply wait and see, its all we can do.

        Loading editor
    • The entire fanbase? Um, you're the only one who really cares. 

        Loading editor
    • Heeha wrote:
      The entire fanbase? Um, you're the only one who really cares. 

      NO! I am NOT the only one who cares. Billions of people of the fanbase feel the same way I do. BILLIONS of people care about the Chipettes! 

      The Chipettes are not Scrappies! THey are very unique! 

        Loading editor
    • Then how come you're the only one complaining? 

        Loading editor
    • I'm NOT the only one. Anyway I'm not complaining,. I'm just struggling for what I beleive is best for the Bagdasarian legacy. And what's best is having The Chipettes appear in Film #4.

        Loading editor
    • Yes you are compalining. You act like it's the end of the world just because the Chipettes won't be appearing in Road Chip. 

      And it hasn't even been confirmed if they'll be appearing or not anyway. 

        Loading editor
    • DEmersonJMFM
      DEmersonJMFM removed this reply because:
      Off-topic.
      13:51, April 18, 2015
      This reply has been removed
    • Sorry it's just that Six Chipmunks are better than three. 

        Loading editor
    • Eh...

        Loading editor
    • Heeha wrote:
      Eh...

      Don't "Eh" me! it's true. Six Chipmunks are better than three. 

        Loading editor
    • That's an opinion. 

        Loading editor
    • Ngh93 wrote:
      Heeha wrote:
      Eh...
      Don't "Eh" me! it's true. Six Chipmunks are better than three. 

      Everyone has their own opinion; you don't have to like them, just try to respect them. :)

        Loading editor
    • MEANWHILE:

      In other news, AC4 is filming on location at Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport (ATL) today and tomorrow filming possible terminal scenes and "mid-flight" scenes

        Loading editor
    • Oh my God, really?????? :O

        Loading editor
    • AWESOME! can't wait for Road Chip!

        Loading editor
    • Are teh girls even apparing as much as a cameo? :(

        Loading editor
    • Go to this Instagram link: https://instagram.com/p/2Et-EfrLDQ/ 


      I think they're in the movie. read the hashtags

        Loading editor
    • What do you guys think is about to happen in the fourth movie?? I think that they might run away or something  because during the last three movies they weren't with Dave. Why do you guys think?? 

        Loading editor
    • You do realize the plot's been revealed, right? 

        Loading editor
    • Yes of course... but Im asking because that plot is not enough for us to unerstand what is going to happen  exactly... and I'd be great to hear people's opinions and ideas!!

        Loading editor
    • Chiplover123 wrote:
      Yes of course... but Im asking because that plot is not enough for us to unerstand what is going to happen  exactly... and I'd be great to hear people's opinions and ideas!!
      1. Through a series of misunderstandings, Alvin, Simon and Theodore come to believe that Dave is going to propose to his new girlfriend in New York City... and dump them. They have three days to get to him and stop the proposal, saving themselves not only from losing Dave but possibly from gaining a terrible stepbrother.  I think that's pretty much all its gonna be about
        Loading editor
    • I've seen that before but that's not enough for us to understand what is about to happen... oh well.. let's just wait for the trailer!

        Loading editor
    • I dunno, it seems pretty explanatory to me. 

        Loading editor
    • Anywayyyy..........

        Loading editor
    • Chipettes in the movie? yes or no?

      I mean I can't imagine why they wouldn't be in the movie, but it seems like the kind of thing that might make the reboot a little cheaper and an easy enough excuse to say they rebooted it and we should just be happy they brought back the Chipmunks and stars. And I know this question's pretty pointless as I don't think anyone can answer it or not and this board's filled with mostly all haters anyway, but I just wanted to ask. 


      So are The Chipettes in the movie or not, anyone got any idea?

        Loading editor
    • Ngh93 wrote:
      Chipettes in the movie? yes or no?

      I mean I can't imagine why they wouldn't be in the movie, but it seems like the kind of thing that might make the reboot a little cheaper and an easy enough excuse to say they rebooted it and we should just be happy they brought back the Chipmunks and stars. And I know this question's pretty pointless as I don't think anyone can answer it or not and this board's filled with mostly all haters anyway, but I just wanted to ask.

      It's looking like they will make an appearance (likely a small one) as described of the film's article page. It's been stated to you elsewhere why they don't have to be in the film.

      Everyone's free to express their preference. Just because someone doesn't agree with what you say doesn't make them a hater.

        Loading editor
    • Fine but I want the next film to involve the girls as well. I want more media involving the CGI realistic chipettes.  Any reason they won't have much of a role here? Do you see the girls as individual uniuque characters instead of just gender flipped versions of the boys? I most certainly see them as unique. 

        Loading editor
    • I absolutely agree with Ngh93! It would be a disappointment for all the couple fans... LIKE ME! 

        Loading editor
    • Ngh93 wrote:
      Fine but I want the next film to involve the girls as well. I want more media involving the CGI realistic chipettes.  Any reason they won't have much of a role here? Do you see the girls as individual uniuque characters instead of just gender flipped versions of the boys? I most certainly see them as unique. 

      Well you see the stories the film is based on did not have them in them; Lovesick Dave because they didn't exist back then; and Dave's Getting Married because the story didn't need them. 

        Loading editor
    • Ngh93 wrote:
      Any reason they won't have much of a role here?

      The simple answer has already been given; the plot doesn't seem like one that is meant to contain much of them. As stated before, this is not a bad thing. There are plots with just The Chipmunks and with just The Chipettes (though there has yet, and probably never will be, a film with just the girls).

      As Tankengineguy just stated, the two episodes the film is likely based on don't have the girls either. This isn't necessary a confirmation they should or shouldn't be in the film. Perhaps just a contributing factor.

      I am also a couple fan and would love more moments but, from my time in this franchise, it would be foolish for me to ignore the basic fact that the boys and the girls are not involved in everything together.

        Loading editor
    • DEmersonJMFM wrote:
      Ngh93 wrote:
      Any reason they won't have much of a role here?
      The simple answer has already been given; the plot doesn't seem like one that is meant to contain much of them. As stated before, this is not a bad thing. There are plots with just The Chipmunks and with just The Chipettes (though there has yet, and probably never will be, a film with just the girls).

      As Tankengineguy just stated, the two episodes the film is likely based on don't have the girls either. This isn't necessary a confirmation they should or shouldn't be in the film. Perhaps just a contributing factor.

      I am also a couple fan and would love more moments but, from my time in this franchise, it would be foolish for me to ignore the basic fact that the boys and the girls are not involved in everything together.

      The Chipettes might be in a few minutes of the film or something, after all an Eleanor plush was spotted on set.

        Loading editor
    • Tankengineguy wrote:

      The Chipettes might be in a few minutes of the film or something, after all an Eleanor plush was spotted on set.

      This I know though dancers with motion capture gear have been seen for all the chipmunks so they are all likely to be in the film (if they aren't cut).

        Loading editor
    • DEmersonJMFM wrote:
      Tankengineguy wrote:

      The Chipettes might be in a few minutes of the film or something, after all an Eleanor plush was spotted on set.

      This I know though dancers with motion capture gear have been seen for all the chipmunks so they are all likely to be in the film (if they aren't cut).

      I don't think cutting the Chipettes will do the film any favours apart from backlash from fans.

        Loading editor
    • Tankengineguy wrote: There are plots with just The Chipmunks and with just The Chipettes (though there has yet, and probably never will be, a film with just the girls)
      DEmersonJMFM wrote:
      Tankengineguy wrote:

      The Chipettes might be in a few minutes of the film or something, after all an Eleanor plush was spotted on set.

      This I know though dancers with motion capture gear have been seen for all the chipmunks so they are all likely to be in the film (if they aren't cut).
      I don't think cutting the Chipettes will do the film any favours apart from backlash from fans.

      Well maybe not much backlash, but huge dissapointment from fans. 

      And why exactly can't the girl's have their own movie? That's actually not a bad idea. We could discover their orgin story before Ian found them. Why can't Brittany, Jeanette and Eleanor have their own reboot? Are they too static? They don't have enough personality?   They aren't independent enough? Why? 

        Loading editor
    • They could, but it wouldn't nescessarily be a film, but more of a featurette in special features or something like that, and that is my suspicions as well. I think the Chipettes are in the film, but it's going to focus mostly on Alvin, Simon, and Theodore

        Loading editor
    • We haven't heard anything about Christina Applegate, Anna Faris or Amy Poehler returning so does this mean Janice Karman might do it? If so that would be just awesome! Another thing that has had me scratching my head; I wonder what Tony Hale's villain has against Alvin, Simon and Theodore.

        Loading editor
    • Ngh93 wrote:

      And why exactly can't the girl's have their own movie?

      I never said they can't have their own movie, but that the odds are not in their favor. Compared to The Chipmunks, The Chipettes have many less independent songs and episodes (they are also only in two of the specials with none of the eight by themselves nor do they have a film by themselves). The franchise has repeatedly focused strongly on the boys.

      Sparrow9642 wrote:

      I think the Chipettes are in the film,...

      They are in the film from what has been released.

      Tankengineguy wrote:

      I don't think cutting the Chipettes will do the film any favours...

      I agree. I think it's very unlikely that the producers will cut the girls, but cuts happen sometimes with some good scenes.

      Tankengineguy wrote:

      We haven't heard anything about Christina Applegate, Anna Faris or Amy Poehler returning so does this mean Janice Karman might do it?

      I don't think so. There's been no talk of Janice providing their voices so I wouldn't expect that the voice actors won't be retaining their roles just because we don't know yet. Either way, given The Chipettes are likely going to have a small role, we might not find out until the film's released (Janice could provide their voices but it's hard to speculate with very little to go off of).

        Loading editor
    • I think Tony Hale is a far better actor than David Cross, maybe a stronger villain will make this better than Chipwrecked in a way.

        Loading editor
    • Even thought we've seen many releases, we're still not 100% sure about anything. The girls might be in the movie just like the other two movies, or not at all. I just know that they will give a good explanation about everything. Come on, its Janice!! But I think most of the people agree that the movie should incude the girls as well. I mean it would be a disappointment for all the Alvittany (Albrittina), Simonette and Theonor fans. Even the mixed couple fans.

        Loading editor
    • we have to remember that three singing male chipmunks started it all - not three girls :33 also, the plot for the road chip does sound like a chipmunk-only kinda film, if you know what i mean? oo: 

      (i hope it's okay to join in with the convo!) 

        Loading editor
    • ChirpyChipmunks wrote:

      (i hope it's okay to join in with the convo!) 

      You are free (and much welcomed) to join any conversation at any time on the forum as long as it's on-topic. More people/views help to create a flavorful discussion.

      Chiplover123 wrote:

      ...we're still not 100% sure about anything. ... I just know that they will give a good explanation about everything. Come on, its Janice!! But I think most of the people agree that the movie should incude the girls as well.

      As I was getting to above. Anything can happen in production/post-production. Janice isn't the primary author for this film (if she's even involved in the writing this time) so I don't know if it would have been her idea if The Chipettes have a more minor role. I do, however, think it might be safe to say a large portion of the CGI films fans would like to see the girls again, but there's no ignoring their history.

      Tankengineguy wrote:

      I think Tony Hale is a far better actor than David Cross, maybe a stronger villain will make this better than Chipwrecked in a way.

      I can't recall right off any of Tony Hale's acting. A strong villain could make the film better, but I wonder what kind of villain you would get during a road trip.

        Loading editor
    • That's why I think Ashley (Bella Thorne) is connected to Tony Hale's character, and that the proposal is a set up

        Loading editor
    • DEmersonJMFM wrote:
      ChirpyChipmunks wrote:

      (i hope it's okay to join in with the convo!) 

      You are free (and much welcomed) to join any conversation at any time on the forum as long as it's on-topic. More people/views help to create a flavorful discussion.


      Chiplover123 wrote:

      ...we're still not 100% sure about anything. ... I just know that they will give a good explanation about everything. Come on, its Janice!! But I think most of the people agree that the movie should incude the girls as well. I mean it would be a disappointment for all the Alvittany (Albrittina), Simonette and Theonor fans. Even the mixed couple fans.

      As I was getting to above. Anything can happen in production/post-production. Janice isn't the primary author for this film (if she's even involved in the writing this time) so I don't know if it would have been her idea if The Chipettes have a more minor role. I do, however, think it might be safe to say a large portion of the CGI films fans would like to see the girls again, but there's no ignoring their history.

      No ignoring their history? What's that mean? 

      Also I know the film will indeed enrage  the Alvittany (Albrittina), Simonette and Theonor fans if the girls don't appear even as much as a cameo. It'll get negative backlash from fans who love shipping every Chipmunk and Chipette with their repsective counterpart. That's one negative outcome that's for sure to happen if the girls don't appear (whether or not they have a major role in it;).  

        Loading editor
    • But the first film didn't have the Chipettes either. And in all the negative backlash I've seen surrounding that film (trust me, there's quit a bit of it), I've never seen one complaint that the Chipettes weren't in it. Anyway, if the Chipettes don't appear in Road Chip, I'd personally be more concerned with the films' continuity than the shipping (though to be fair, I never really cared about the shipping in the first place). 

        Loading editor
    • Heeha wrote:
      But the first film didn't have the Chipettes either. And in all the negative backlash I've seen surrounding that film (trust me, there's quit a bit of it), I've never seen one complaint that the Chipettes weren't in it. Anyway, if the Chipettes don't appear in Road Chip, I'd personally be more concerned with the films' continuity than the shipping (though to be fair, I never really cared about the shipping in the first place). 

      You're right. I should be worried about continuity. The Chipettes have to appear in some way (whetehr they have a big role or not) in order for the films to have continuity. Cause every sequel introduced character always has to appear in the next for it to maintain it's continuity.  

      I just hope to hear a confirmation in the news about Christina Anna and Amy returning. That's another key thing to keeping continuity. Role reprisal of key characters. 

        Loading editor
    • Ngh93 wrote:
      Heeha wrote:
      But the first film didn't have the Chipettes either. And in all the negative backlash I've seen surrounding that film (trust me, there's quit a bit of it), I've never seen one complaint that the Chipettes weren't in it. Anyway, if the Chipettes don't appear in Road Chip, I'd personally be more concerned with the films' continuity than the shipping (though to be fair, I never really cared about the shipping in the first place). 
      You're right. I should be worried about continuity. The Chipettes have to appear in some way (whetehr they have a big role or not) in order for the films to have continuity. Cause every sequel introduced character always has to appear in the next for it to maintain it's continuity.  

      I just hope to hear a confirmation in the news about Christina Anna and Amy returning. That's another key thing to keeping continuity. Role reprisal of key characters. 

      Yeah...niether of the things you said are true. Sequel-introduced characters don't have to appear in the next in order for the iflms to have continuity. Toby was introduced in The Squeakquel yet didn't appear in Chipwrecked. Yet it's still very clear that both films (along with the first one) take place in the same universe. 

      Role reprisal has nothing to do with continuity either. Yes, it's better to keep the roles consistent (especially in a particular ongoing work) but it doesn't really show any signs of continuity. People can reprise their roles for works that aren't canon and characters can get new voice actors for works that are canon. 

      I'll use Sonic as an example. The characters in the Sonic games often get their voice actors changed. However, that doesn't mean the games with the other voice actors are non-canon. Likewise, just because one work has the same voice actors, that doesn't mean it's canon. Sonic Boom has the same voice actors as the current games but that doesn't mean it's canon to any of them. 

        Loading editor
    • Heeha wrote:

      Role reprisal has nothing to do with continuity either. Yes, it's better to keep the roles consistent (especially in a particular ongoing work) but it doesn't really show any signs of continuity. People can reprise their roles for works that aren't canon and characters can get new voice actors for works that are canon. 

      I'll use Sonic as an example. The characters in the Sonic games often get their voice actors changed. However, that doesn't mean the games with the other voice actors are non-canon. Likewise, just because one work has the same voice actors, that doesn't mean it's canon. Sonic Boom has the same voice actors as the current games but that doesn't mean it's canon to any of them.

      I never said EVERY sequel introduced character had to appear in the next one. I said KEY introducued characters had to appear in the next film. (I.e: Ellie from Ice Age 2 and onward).  Toby was just a supporting background sequel character and temporary replacement for Dave.   THe Chipettes are important key sequel characters with their own personality and therefore have to appear in the next film to have continuity.

      I can't argue with your other points though but I just stil hope to hear news that confirms from Christina, Anna and Amy rejoin Justin Matthew and Jesse. If not maybe the fifth film can involve both groups of Chipmunks.

        Loading editor
    • Ngh93 wrote:

      I never said EVERY sequel introduced character had to appear in the next one. I said KEY introducued characters had to appear in the next film. (I.e: Ellie from Ice Age 2 and onward).  Toby was just a supporting background sequel character and temporary replacement for Dave.   THe Chipettes are important key sequel characters with their own personality and therefore have to appear in the next film to have continuity.

      I can't argue with your other points though but I just stil hope to hear news that confirms from Christina, Anna and Amy rejoin Justin Matthew and Jesse. If not maybe the fifth film can involve both groups of Chipmunks.

      No, that's exactly what you said. You never said anything about only key characters. I advise you to go reread your response. This is what you said: "Cause every sequel introduced character always has to appear in the next for it to maintain it's continuity." Notice the use of "every". So, yes, you indeed say that every sequel introduced character has to appear in the next film. Besides, whether a key character has to appear in the next film to maintain continuity depends on the events of the film. 

        Loading editor
    • well I meant to say key characters. BUt you're right it depends on the events of the film if sequel introduced characters reappear. 

        Loading editor
    • from what I've heard, Eleanor is getting a new voice actress, but it's nothing official

        Loading editor
    • DEmersonJMFM
      DEmersonJMFM removed this reply because:
      Removing again after test.
      20:48, July 9, 2017
      This reply has been removed
    • i didn't know cgi ellie was getting a new voice actor!! oo: does amy poehler not want to do it anymore, or?? oo:

        Loading editor
    • DEmersonJMFM wrote:
      Sparrow9642 wrote:
      from what I've heard, Eleanor is getting a new voice actress, but it's nothing official
      This is official and can be discussed here.

      ChirpyChipmunks wrote:
      i didn't know cgi ellie was getting a new voice actor!! oo: does amy poehler not want to do it anymore, or?? oo:

      It is most certtainly NOT official. I clicked that link and I saw nothing about amy poelher not repising her role as Eleanor.  Only that voice actress is only voicing her in the new cartoon and providing the singigng voice. 

        Loading editor
    • DEmersonJMFM
      DEmersonJMFM removed this reply because:
      Duplicate.
      19:25, July 1, 2015
      This reply has been removed
    • ChirpyChipmunks wrote:
      i didn't know cgi ellie was getting a new voice actor!! oo: does amy poehler not want to do it anymore, or?? oo:

      It's not. I thought this thread was for the new series, not the film. Simple mistake. I've seen nothing stating or even suggesting Eleanor will be voiced by someone new in the films.

        Loading editor
    • ah okay! o: got a little confused there for a second!!

        Loading editor
    • Like I said, it's nothing official. I follow some helpful sources help to keep me updated on the movie, and even if Eleanor gets a new voice actress, Bagdasarian Productions will probably just speed up the voice to sound like the old Ellie. Who knows? Maybe all the Chipettes are getting new voice actress's. That could be a reason why they haven't appeared on IMDb yet, but THIS IS NOTHING OFFICIAL. It's only a theory.

        Loading editor
    • I hope you are right because new voice actresses are better than nothing

        Loading editor
    • Chiplover123 wrote:
      I hope you are right because new voice actresses are better than nothing

      Please I pray for CHristina Applegate, Anna Faris adn Amy Poheler to return as the Chipettes. They gave the chipettes more personality than Janice did. Fans would love them to retun even if they don't have much of arole here. 

      Justin Matthew and Jesse already repriesed. I'm getting worried already.

        Loading editor
    • What do you mean that Justin, Matthew and Jesse already repriesed?

        Loading editor
    • Chiplover123 wrote:
      What do you mean that Justin, Matthew and Jesse already repriesed?

      Meaning they are confirmed to voice The Chipmunks in the new film.

        Loading editor
    • DEmersonJMFM
      DEmersonJMFM removed this reply because:
      Off-topic.
      16:24, July 4, 2015
      This reply has been removed
    • Ok, what's so bad about that?

        Loading editor
    • Sparrow9642 wrote:
      Ok, what's so bad about that?

      About what?

        Loading editor
    • I was replying to Ngh93, because it sounded as if he/she was not liking the fact Justin, Jesse, and Matthew are returning as the voices for the Chipmunks.

        Loading editor
    • Sparrow9642 wrote:
      I was replying to Ngh93, because it sounded as if he/she was not liking the fact Justin, Jesse, and Matthew are returning as the voices for the Chipmunks.

      No, what I don't like is The fact that Christina Anna and Amy haven't been confirmed as reprising their roles as the Chipettes and It's only 6 months away! I'm worried as ever!


        Loading editor
    • Guess we'll see when the movie trailer is released

        Loading editor
    • That makes me even more worried. WHat'll become of the girls?! I'm desperate for them.  

        Loading editor
    • They are in the 4th film, I can assure you. I just think they won't get much screentime, and that the plot of this movie is going to focus more on the boys.

        Loading editor
    • Either way, just be glad they made a 4th film.

        Loading editor
    • Sparrow9642 wrote:
      They are in the 4th film, I can assure you. I just think they won't get much screentime, and that the plot of this movie is going to focus more on the boys.

      Eh. That's still rather a shame. I loved how both trios worked and performed together in Chipwrecked. Each Chipmunk had their own storyline and how they come close to their counterparts. I always say six Chipmunks are better than three.  Not to mention the romantic tensions of both groups--especially Alvin and Brittany.

        Loading editor
    • Let's stay on-topic, otherwise the admin will close the thread

        Loading editor
    • Anyways... Anybody seen new pictures, anything?

        Loading editor
    • I enjoy seeing The Chipmunks and The Chipettes togethers, I would be happy if I saw them in the forth movie. However reading the plot (synopsis) of the movie, I see that the chipettes don't need to appear in the movie because that is not the focus of it. Maybe they will appear with a shorter screentime as Sparrow9642 said.

        Loading editor
    • I really hope Road Chip is better than Chipwrecked, I still enjoy that movie but I do admit it was kinda weak.

        Loading editor
    • DEmersonJMFM
      DEmersonJMFM removed this reply because:
      Off-topic.
      17:57, July 5, 2015
      This reply has been removed
    • DEmersonJMFM
      DEmersonJMFM removed this reply because:
      Off-topic.
      17:57, July 5, 2015
      This reply has been removed
    • DEmersonJMFM
      DEmersonJMFM removed this reply because:
      Off-topic.
      17:57, July 5, 2015
      This reply has been removed
    • Let's stay on topic guys. If you wish to talk about your favorite film, there's a separate thread for that. Please move the discussion there, thanks.

      Chiplover123 wrote: Anyways... Anybody seen new pictures, anything?

      None that I've seen. If filming is over (I think it is), then we probably won't get anything new for a while. The animation is likely in the works now.

        Loading editor
    • sorry! :((

        Loading editor
    • I agree with the admin. There is only about 5 months left, so the animation is probably being done as we speak.

        Loading editor
    • So why aren't the Chipettes appearring?! WHat's the REAL reason?! I demand to know. 

        Loading editor
    • Nobody knows except almost everybody associated with the film, and you can't demand. The Chipettes will return, but probably with a more minor role than the Chipmunks.

        Loading editor
    • DEmersonJMFM
      DEmersonJMFM removed this reply because:
      Not necessary.
      02:25, July 6, 2015
      This reply has been removed
    • Ngh93 wrote:
      So why aren't the Chipettes appearring?! WHat's the REAL reason?! I demand to know.

      You have been told numerous times about this. Your posts are very repetitious and all future posts on this topic will be removed.

      Sparrow9642 wrote:
      There is only about 5 months left, so the animation is probably being done as we speak.

      I wouldn't mind some images throughout the process, but we probably won't get much, if anything.

        Loading editor
    • I'd like to see images as well, but it probably won't be for awhile

        Loading editor
    • If anybody sees anything new please speak!

        Loading editor
    • I think Fox is trolling us all with this and if it will be in the film,because I dont not see why was there a plush of Eleanor in the set

        Loading editor
    • Another thing

      Has anyone thougth that Alvin and his brothers are those who hear about that?

        Loading editor
    • GUYS!!

      THE FIRST TRAILER GETS POSTED TOMORROW!! :DDD

        Loading editor
    •   Loading editor
    • THANKS YOU SO MUCH FOR THE AVICE

        Loading editor
    • Spidey2003 wrote:

      I think Fox is trolling us all with this and if it will be in the film,because I dont not see why was there a plush of Eleanor in the set
      Another thing

      Has anyone thougth that Alvin and his brothers are those who hear about that?

      What do you mean by "trolling"? You saying the Ellie plush was a LIE?! The Chipettes aren't doinge even a cameo? 

      It's all about the boys? WHy is that? What's wrong with the Chipettes? Is it only because they weren't orignally created by Ross Sr?

      I Don't mean to be repetitive. WHat'll becoem of the girls if they don't appear as much as even a cameo or minor role or even failed of any mention?  I'm just as worried and dissapointed  as ever. At least have them mentioned or cameo if they have a minor role. I pray for that.

        Loading editor
    • ChirpyChipmunks wrote:
      here's the source for proof ^_^ https://twitter.com/taulukos/status/618081646084947969

      I can't find anything from any of the official sites about this so I'm a little concerned. We'll see tomorrow if a trailer is actually released.

        Loading editor
    • DEmersonJMFM wrote:
      ChirpyChipmunks wrote:
      here's the source for proof ^_^ https://twitter.com/taulukos/status/618081646084947969
      I can't find anything from any of the official sites about this so I'm a little concerned. We'll see tomorrow if a trailer is actually released.

      Not necessarily. This could only just be a teaser trailer that's just a minute and a half long and doesn't show the plot that's been discussed or antyhing. The teaser for the pervious film just had Alvin mimicking Titanic screaming "King of the World." 

        Loading editor
    • It's the 7th of July... WHERE IS THE FREAKING TRAILER, I'M GOING NUTS!!!!!!!!!!!!! *Ready to jump off the window*

        Loading editor
    •  

      Nonono,I didn't want to say that! 

      I want to say Fox are doing it on purpose to worry the fans of the Chippettes, i used bad the term trolling. 

      And, in my other comment, I did not say in the story only appears the boys,the boys can heard about the plan of Dave.In the sipnosis says THEY want to stop Dave.They can be the boys,but maybe can be the six chipmunks. 

        Loading editor
    • TRAILER ONE!!! (not a teaser!!)

      https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=928087230566065

      NEW CLIPS. NEW SONG!!!!!

        Loading editor
    • note; there's no chipettes in this first trailer, but you never know, they might be in the 2nd or 3rd trailer :33 

        Loading editor
    • ChirpyChipmunks wrote:
      note; there's no chipettes in this first trailer, but you never know, they might be in the 2nd or 3rd trailer :33 

      Alright but let me ask you this: Do Christina Applegate, Anna Faris, and Amy Poheler need to reprise their roles in order for the girls to appear at all?

      Is that what we depend on? Cause they haven't and it's 6 months away.

        Loading editor
    • i'm not very good at explaining things, but, they would need to reprise their roles in order for the girls to appear in the film oo: otherwise they'd be voiceless and, if they've not been cut from the whole thing at this stage, just silent background characters - if you know what i mean? ^^;; 

        Loading editor
    • I think I do know what you mean. After all, I see a 100s of "Where are the Chipettes :(" comments on the trailer post.  Which Many fans are already severely dissapointed about no confirmation for the girls. It's like the screenwriter for Road Chip never saw Squeakquel or Chipwrecked. 

        Loading editor
    • i'm sure they are in the film, wether or not they have a large or small role, i'm not sure - it's the waiting game atm!

      but, at the end of the first trailer, it says "alvin and the chipmunks, //the chipettes// and characters tm & (c) 2015 bagdasarian productions, llc, all right reserved"  - which could give us a little bit more proof/information that they'll be in this film! :33

      if we're all lucky enough, the girls might make a cameo in the 2nd trailer! :33 or the 3rd! have to wait and see! :D 

        Loading editor
    • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UI_nj4NXpoQ

      Here's the link to the trailer

        Loading editor
    • Attention all:

      As this thread is getting very long, I created a new discussion for the trailers of the new film. ALL future discussions about the trailers should be made here. Thanks.

        Loading editor
    • The song "On the Road Again" should be in The Road Chip"

        Loading editor
    • Sparrow9642
      Sparrow9642 removed this reply because:
      it doesn't belong here, but in another discussion
      21:49, July 7, 2015
      This reply has been removed
    • Ngh93 your comments are getting annoying and repetitive. The Chipettes are in the movie, because at the end of the trailer it says, "Alvin and the Chipmunks and the Chipettes are registered property of 20th Century Fox and Bagdasarian Productions," or something like that. THE CHIPETTES ARE IN THE MOVIE, just maybe not in a major role. Quit repeating the same stuff over and over, because the Chipettes are in this one. This is a teaser trailer, we will get more trailers revealing more and more, as we play the waiting game. Hopefully that answers your question for the last time.

        Loading editor
    • https://www.facebook.com/AlvinMovies?fref=ts Look at the left side, and you will see that Eleanor has a new voice actress, but Anna Faris, and Christina Applegate will be reprising their roles as Brittany and Jeanette, so CHIPETTES CONFIRMED

        Loading editor
    • Ngh93
      Ngh93 removed this reply because:
      off topic
      00:39, July 8, 2015
      This reply has been removed
    • Sparrow9642 wrote:
      https://www.facebook.com/AlvinMovies?fref=ts Look at the left side, and you will see that Eleanor has a new voice actress, but Anna Faris, and Christina Applegate will be reprising their roles as Brittany and Jeanette, so CHIPETTES CONFIRMED

      Great to hear they're returning. :) Thank you

        Loading editor
    • your welcome, and Amy Poeler will not be reprising her role, it's now confirmed on wiki

        Loading editor
    • Sparrow9642 wrote:
      your welcome, and Amy Poeler will not be reprising her role, it's now confirmed on wiki

      Let me guess why: a schedule in her contract for  PIxar's Inside Out?

        Loading editor
    • Yes

        Loading editor
    • Sparrow9642 wrote:
      https://www.facebook.com/AlvinMovies?fref=ts Look at the left side, and you will see that Eleanor has a new voice actress, but Anna Faris, and Christina Applegate will be reprising their roles as Brittany and Jeanette, so CHIPETTES CONFIRMED

      Great to hear that!

        Loading editor
    • They will JUST appear, OR they will be in the WHOLE movie just like in Chipwrecked? Please someone answer!!!

        Loading editor
    • none of us know exactly if the girls will have just a cameo or be in the whole thing ^^;; we'll have to wait for another trailer and the film itself to find out! :3

        Loading editor
    • Ohh... thanks!!! And when (do you think) the WHOLE trailer will come out? I believe near the end of August orrrr..... September.... 

        Loading editor
    • ooh - my guess for the 2nd trailer to be released is around october time! :33 and my gues for the 3rd trailer to be released is around november! oo: have to wait and see!! :D

      also - since this thread is a little too long, you can talk over here about the trailers ^_^ http://alvin.wikia.com/wiki/Thread:17894 

        Loading editor
    • Okay, thank you!

        Loading editor
    • DEmersonJMFM
      DEmersonJMFM removed this reply because:
      Off-topic. Wikipedia and IMDb don't matter here.
      02:28, July 10, 2015
      This reply has been removed
    • DEmersonJMFM
      DEmersonJMFM removed this reply because:
      Pertaining to deleted posts.
      02:34, July 10, 2015
      This reply has been removed
    • DEmersonJMFM
      DEmersonJMFM removed this reply because:
      Off-topic.
      02:32, July 10, 2015
      This reply has been removed
    • DEmersonJMFM
      DEmersonJMFM removed this reply because:
      Pertaining to deleted posts.
      02:33, July 10, 2015
      This reply has been removed
    • DEmersonJMFM
      DEmersonJMFM removed this reply because:
      Off-topic. What IMDb does doesn't matter here.
      02:32, July 10, 2015
      This reply has been removed
    • DEmersonJMFM
      DEmersonJMFM removed this reply because:
      Pertaining to deleted posts.
      02:34, July 10, 2015
      This reply has been removed
    • Finally, after many debates, it has finally being confirmed that the chipettes are returning (albet Amy isn't reprising the role of Eleanor). Other than that that is AWESOME. 

      Now That is what folllows the Bagdasarian tradition that makes fans proud and satisfied. :)

        Loading editor
    • GinEnglish96 wrote:
      Heeha wrote:
      You don't seem to understand. While a design change doesn't nessicarily mean they're not connected, these design changes do. It's too big of a change. One that contradicts the movies. If they were connected, the designs would've been a lot closer to the movies. While I can understand maybe simplifying their fur as a design change, they've changed way too much for them to be considered connected. First of all, they've changed the characters ' eye colors. Not to mention giving them different clothes. 
      Exactly!

      And it's not even about the designs, guys. The Chipettes don't live with Dave in the new series, they live in a treehouse, Miss Miller is a character there, and they're probably not in high school either (just judging by the students' voices). The films have no connection to the series, regarding the way the characters live, let alone the drastic design change.

      Theres actully a episode in the TV show that is called the Treehouse that explains why the Chipettes move dout it is the 2nd episode made XD and its been confurmed to be in High School :D

        Loading editor
    • ChirpyChipmunks wrote:
      i'm sure they are in the film, wether or not they have a large or small role, i'm not sure - it's the waiting game atm!

      but, at the end of the first trailer, it says "alvin and the chipmunks, //the chipettes// and characters tm & (c) 2015 bagdasarian productions, llc, all right reserved"  - which could give us a little bit more proof/information that they'll be in this film! :33

      if we're all lucky enough, the girls might make a cameo in the 2nd trailer! :33 or the 3rd! have to wait and see! :D 

      I noticed that to! i think the Chipettes were driving the car lol and for sure there in it!

        Loading editor
    • Something tells me the movie will be rated PG-13.

        Loading editor
    • Bigbrad wrote:
      Something tells me the movie will be rated PG-13.

      I highly doubt that the film (or anything in the franchise) will be PG-13. PG is very likely the highest it will go.

        Loading editor
    • DEmersonJMFM wrote:
      Bigbrad wrote:
      Something tells me the movie will be rated PG-13.
      I highly doubt that the film (or anything in the franchise) will be PG-13. PG is very likely the highest it will go.

      I agree. After all the first two were PG while the third was G. How could  comedies with CGI talking animals possibly be PG-13?

        Loading editor
    • Well, the first trailer had some thug knocking out Tony Hale out of a bar through the windows, causing the glass to break and Tony Hale fell into a trash can. Plus, Tony Hale might be the "horrible stepbrother" that will the villain in the movie.

        Loading editor
    • DEmersonJMFM wrote:
      Bigbrad wrote:
      Something tells me the movie will be rated PG-13.
      I highly doubt that the film (or anything in the franchise) will be PG-13. PG is very likely the highest it will go.

      Agreeed! There not ever going to be pg-13 its always PG or G

        Loading editor
    • Again, the trailer?

        Loading editor
    • It'll more than likely be PG, probably for some mild violence, rude humor, and alcoholic references (bar scene)

        Loading editor
    • Well, that might be true. But we must wait for the second trailer for more information.

        Loading editor
    • Sparrow9642 wrote:
      It'll more than likely be PG, probably for some mild violence, rude humor, and alcoholic references (bar scene)

      I agree it will most likey be PG 

        Loading editor
    • Plus, who is this girlfriend Dave is going to propose?

        Loading editor
    • Knowing every AATC episode I've seen, this proposal probably won't be even a real proposal, but more of a misunderstanding on the Chipmunks part. Her name is Ashley btw, but that's all we know atm

        Loading editor
    • I absolutely agree with Sparrow9642. The plot says series of misunderstanding. That means, that probably she is not his girlfriend and she is just a friend, or a manager, or whatever and maybe Alvin will overhear a conversation and tell the others what he heard, which is not going to be the right thing! But, there is still a possibility that she is his girlfriend and that they are going to get married. We just don't know what is happening, that's all. As for the rating. I don't think it's going to be rated PG-13, because simply it always was a kids thing... AND for grownups, don't get me wrong there.

        Loading editor
    • But could this thread be closed down when the movie airs or if this thread goes off-topic?

        Loading editor
    • Whenever DEmersonJMFM says.

        Loading editor
    • Bigbrad wrote:
      But could this thread be closed down when the movie airs or if this thread goes off-topic?

      The thread will probably be closed when the film airs as this topic is more about discussing the idea of a fourth film. Another thread will likely be created to talk about the film itself after it premieres in theaters. Going off-topic isn't allowed and if you do try to get this thread closed by going off-topic after asking that we'll have bigger issues.

      Sparrow9642 wrote:
      Knowing every AATC episode I've seen, this proposal probably won't be even a real proposal,...

      Most definitely. Alvin acts on things he hears so often and most of the time he takes something out of context, reaches the wrong conclusion, and/or is just plain wrong. Plus, the synopsis clearly states it's a misunderstanding.

      Chiplover123 wrote:
      I don't think it's going to be rated PG-13, because simply it always was a kids thing...

      The target age that the franchise is primarily (not exclusively) directed to has traditionally been 6-12. A PG-13 film would knock out a large demographic so would be a poor move to create a script with such a rating.

      Bigbrad wrote:
      Again, the trailer?

      This was more a teaser than a trailer as the scenes used are somewhat generic (the opening) or modified from those used elsewhere. As seem before, not everything in a promo is actually in every film (one of the films had something that was different than the trailer). It's possible the scenes might be modified, but I agree with Sparrow9642's assessment of the rating.

        Loading editor
    • I just hope to see the Chipettes in the next trailer. I know they are confirmed to appear as stated from Munkapedia and Facebook, but i'm still worried considering I still haven't seen any footage of the girls . Seeing Brittany Jeanette and Eleanor in the next trailer or movieclip for Road Chip would absolutely completely cease my worries aabout the Chipette's status.

        Loading editor
    • expect the next trailer around September

        Loading editor
    • Sparrow9642 wrote:
      expect the next trailer around September

      Thanks I hope it will also sease my worries about Anna and Christina being added to the cast list on imdb (which for some odd reason, only Kaley is listed as Eleanor) and apple.trailers. 

      Is my wish Extremely likely to come true?


        Loading editor
    • How do you know that?

        Loading editor
    • Bigbrad wrote:
      How do you know that?

      Know what?


        Loading editor
    • About the next trailer coming September.

        Loading editor
    • Bigbrad wrote:
      About the next trailer coming September.

      I only knew because Sparrow9642 told me. Perhaps you should ask him how he knows the next trailer is airing  in September?


        Loading editor
    • Well what about DEmersonJMFM Administrator? Can we ask him?

        Loading editor
    • Sparrow9642 just guessed because it's a possible month for the trailer to come out. I absolutely agree with Sparrow9642, as well... I just hope it does come out then, and HOPEFULLY the girls are in the official trailer. I am excited!!!

        Loading editor
    • I believe that is when it will come out, because then 2 or 3 more will be released a month apart, so like this. Trailer 2- September, Trailer 3- October, Trailer 4- November, then we play the waiting game up until the release of the movie in December. That's usually how it works with almost every movie, and if Eleanor is there, I'm pretty sure Brittany and Jeanette will be too.

        Loading editor
    • Of course the girls are in the movie! As long as the facebook page says it, which does! Anyone heard anything new about the movie?

        Loading editor
    • GUYS! I'm really sorry if I'm late, and I'm the last one who saw this, but for those who didn't know, I just found in Alvin and the chipmunks the Road Chip wikipedia this:

      Cast

      Justin Long as Alvin

      Jason Lee as David Seville

      Matthew Gray Gubler as Simon

      Jesse McCartney as Theodore

      Christina Applegate as Brittany

      Anna Faris as Jeanette

      Kaley Cuoco as Eleanor

      Bella Thorne as Ashley

      Kimberly Williams- Paisley as Shira

      Tony Hale


      AND!!!

      The plot

      With Dave planning to propose to his new girlfriend in New York, the chipmunks come to believe that he's going to get rid of them afterwards. In an attempt to stop him, they go on an epic road, with a time limit of only three days.


      - So the girls are OFFICIALLY in the movie, AND we have a new plot.... AND we'll probably have a marriage!

        Loading editor
    • And new chipmunks to adopt?

        Loading editor
    • marriage is possible, but most unlikely

        Loading editor
    • Chiplover123 wrote:
      GUYS! I'm really sorry if I'm late, and I'm the last one who saw this, but for those who didn't know, I just found in Alvin and the chipmunks the Road Chip wikipedia this:

      Cast

      Justin Long as Alvin

      Jason Lee as David Seville

      Matthew Gray Gubler as Simon

      Jesse McCartney as Theodore

      Christina Applegate as Brittany

      Anna Faris as Jeanette

      Kaley Cuoco as Eleanor

      Bella Thorne as Ashley

      Kimberly Williams- Paisley as Shira

      Tony Hale


      AND!!!

      The plot

      With Dave planning to propose to his new girlfriend in New York, the chipmunks come to believe that he's going to get rid of them afterwards. In an attempt to stop him, they go on an epic road, with a time limit of only three days.


      - So the girls are OFFICIALLY in the movie, AND we have a new plot.... AND we'll probably have a marriage!

      Great! I'm so glad it's ofically on wikipedia that the girls are OFFICALLY appearing. :) THAT's following the Bagdasarian legacy. 

      However, I don't wanna be repeditve but now that wikipedia offically includes the girls the next site to update is  imdb for it to say the same as wikipedeia (such as adding Anna and Christina to the cast list). Once that's done, I think all my worries will be over! :)

        Loading editor
    • Ngh93, for the last time, the reason IMDb isn't showing the girls listed, is because it doesn't update as often as it should. If it's official on FB, Munkipedia, and Wikipedia, it's official on all website, even though it isn't posted.

        Loading editor
    • Sparrow9642 wrote:
      Ngh93, for the last time, the reason IMDb isn't showing the girls listed, is because it doesn't update as often as it should. If it's official on FB, Munkipedia, and Wikipedia, it's official on all website, even though it isn't posted.

      Sorry sparrow. I don't mean to bring up previous topics we discussed. I'll repeat bottom line: But the girls are appearing and that's a FANTASTIC thing to know. Already confirmed on Munkepidia, FB, regular wiki and the Road Chip's official website (the last one just came to my mind).

      I get it The girls appearing is OFFICIAL on every web post even those not posted. I get it. It's just Something not posted yet? Right?

        Loading editor
    • No, if it's official on an official page, it's official. The girls will be returning, IMDb just isn't updated.

        Loading editor
    • Lol  ahaa I love how you said "if its official on an official page, its official" hahhaha... but yeahhhh... yeah.... I agree!!

        Loading editor
    • yeah, it's a real tongue twister

        Loading editor
    • Whatever the case may be, I'd be 100% reassured whenever I see actual footage of the girls.  Could someone send me a link for that (if/when it comes)? Any articles, theatrical posters of the girls... etc. Any media evidence would make all this worrysome-ness go away and I'm not the only one with these worries  (i'm just probably the only one who expresses this worry).

      Thanks Can't wait for media evidence for Brittney, Jeanette and Eleanor' status. 

        Loading editor
    • I highly doubt that any of the posters are gonna feature the Chipettes, based on the plot that's been released. We might not even see them in the trailers, depending on their role in the film. 

        Loading editor
    •  Heeha  wrote:
      I highly doubt that any of the posters are gonna feature the Chipettes, based on the plot that's been released. We might not even see them in the trailers, depending on their role in the film. 

      'That is the worst reassurance I've ever recieved. They must have a some sort of a role and contribute to the plot. WHy would we have confirmed their voice actresses if the CHipettes were barely gonna appear and contriubte less to the  the plot. Trailers and posters aren't always always completely correct. ANybody have something more positive than Heeha here? Does anybody have info on the CHipette's role status. I loved the teamwork in  Chipwrecked. ANd the romantic tensions. 

      Anybody got a more positive answer than Heeha? Anybody believe the girls ARE appearing in trailers and posters? WHo knows the role of the girls in ROad CHip?

        Loading editor
    • Caaaalm.... DOWN Ngh93! Everything is going to be FINE! The girls are in the movie.... they have an important role, because when their names are written in wikipedia, they are first next to the chipmunks, so that means they get to appear as much as the chipmunks. You need to calm down with the chipettes thing. They ARE in the movie, they ARE in the trailer and everything is going to be fine. Just... wait and you'll see!

        Loading editor
    • Chiplover123 wrote:
      Caaaalm.... DOWN Ngh93! Everything is going to be FINE! The girls are in the movie.... they have an important role, because when their names are written in wikipedia, they are first next to the chipmunks, so that means they get to appear as much as the chipmunks. You need to calm down with the chipettes thing. They ARE in the movie, they ARE in the trailer and everything is going to be fine. Just... wait and you'll see!

      You're right. I'm overreacting. I do need to calm down. I'm making this Chipette's thing ridiculous.

      The thing is, I suffer from high functioning autism. For example, I tend to get nervous and overract to something so irrelivant to the rest of the world. I really need to work on that more. 

        Loading editor
    • How is what I said negative at all? I'm just stating what I think is the most likely to happen. Someone saying the "Chipettes will appear in the trailers and posters" isn't a postive answer. How is that a positive answer? We're just stating things. It's not positive or negative. 

        Loading editor
    • When will the next trailer come?

        Loading editor
    • We don't know. 

        Loading editor
    • Lackily in September. It's logic!

        Loading editor
    • I saw the trailer in theaters a month ago and I immediately knew it was for this movie when I saw the words, "The Road Trip." The trailer was decent and the ending was pretty funny with Dave. 

      I am very excited for this movie. I always liked the films. 

        Loading editor
    • Wait.... You saw the new trailer or tha one we already have???

        Loading editor
    • The first trailer. 

        Loading editor
    • In other words he's already seen the teaser trailer.  Just to avoid confusion. 

        Loading editor
    • ok, first about the movie poster, this is the theatrical poster, not the official one that they will stick with, it'll change. Second, the next trailer is probably coming out mid or early September, because there's usually a total of 4 trailers, so if we go like this, Trailer 1- July, then there's a two month deficit until the official. Trailer 2- September, trailer 3- October, trailer 4- November, and then waiting game until release in December. This cycle makes sense, and I believe is what we are to expect. As for the girls, they are in the movie. Relax! Until any further info is released, we won't know for sure, but this is my guess, and more than likely how things are going to go.

        Loading editor
    • Totally agree with you Sparrow9642.

        Loading editor
    • Ngh93 the Chipettes are official confirmed on Imdb, no need to worry anymore.

        Loading editor
    • That's MUNKTASTIC! 

        Loading editor
    • YAY! since the girls r finally confirmed, there better b some Bralvin in the 4th movie

        Loading editor
    • ^ I agree with you. I want more Alvin and Brittany moments in this movie. I am looking forward to this movie. Waiting for the next trailer is going to be hard. 

        Loading editor
    • Hope the next trailer will be around this month.

        Loading editor
    • Yeah. 

        Loading editor
    • I heard the Chipettes will do Shake It Off by Taylor Swift; is there any truth to this? I hope so because Janice Karman's amazing voice would make that song not only great but Incredible!

        Loading editor
    • No confirmation on any official songs except "Uptown Munks" has been released, so until the soundtrack is released in November, we'll have to wait

        Loading editor
    • I saw on the Alvin Twitter page there's a picture of the Chipettes which sys they're ready to "Shake It Off" with a few lyrics. We're only 4 or 3 months away from the film's release and we suddenly get this out of the blue. I don't think that a coincident.

        Loading editor
    • Tankengineguy wrote:
      I saw on the Alvin Twitter page there's a picture of the Chipettes which sys they're ready to "Shake It Off" with a few lyrics. We're only 4 or 3 months away from the film's release and we suddenly get this out of the blue. I don't think that a coincident.

      I wish the music from 2013-2015 didn't suck, or I'd actually want to look forward to the music in this movie. Still going to see it none the less. But again the songs like "Uptown Munk" I'm still questionable about

        Loading editor
    • I think Shake It Off will be great. After all, Janice is an amazing singer. I wouldn't be surprised if The Chipettes' version was better then Taylor Swift's.

        Loading editor
    • Tankengineguy wrote:
      I think Shake It Off will be great. After all, Janice is an amazing singer. I wouldn't be surprised if The Chipettes' version was better then Taylor Swift's.

      idk i'm not a huge t swift fan...in fact the only song i like by her is bad blood, cuz kendrick lamar was on the track and the video was pretty straight up awesome sauce. Chipettes could do a cover of that, Alvin could get Kendrick's raps. PIcture it: "Bad Blood"- The Chipettes ft. Alvin Seville

        Loading editor
    • If you guys wish to talk about unconfirmed music for the film, please do so on the thread that exists specifically on this topic to help keep this thread from unnecessarily expanding (thus restraining load times).

        Loading editor
    • I hope this movie is really good and to prepare for it, I am going to re-watch all three of the previous Chipmunk films. I love all of them. 

        Loading editor
    • Same here.

        Loading editor
    • Me three.

        Loading editor
    • That's a brilliant idea... I ll rewatch them as well!!

        Loading editor
    • I'll do it the day before I see The Road Chip becuase I want the last three to be fresh in my mind.

        Loading editor
    • i won't get to see the road chip until february 2016 :(( 

      (it's out in the UK in feb...) 

        Loading editor
    • Oh. That's sad

        Loading editor
    • IMusic.Wolf wrote:
      Tankengineguy wrote:
      I saw on the Alvin Twitter page there's a picture of the Chipettes which sys they're ready to "Shake It Off" with a few lyrics. We're only 4 or 3 months away from the film's release and we suddenly get this out of the blue. I don't think that a coincident.
      I wish the music from 2013-2015 didn't suck, or I'd actually want to look forward to the music in this movie. Still going to see it none the less. But again the songs like "Uptown Munk" I'm still questionable about

      Where is that Twitter page? could you send me the link? 

        Loading editor
    • IMusic.Wolf wrote:
      Tankengineguy wrote:
      I saw on the Alvin Twitter page there's a picture of the Chipettes which sys they're ready to "Shake It Off" with a few lyrics. We're only 4 or 3 months away from the film's release and we suddenly get this out of the blue. I don't think that a coincident.
      I wish the music from 2013-2015 didn't suck, or I'd actually want to look forward to the music in this movie. Still going to see it none the less. But again the songs like "Uptown Munk" I'm still questionable about

      actually, i'd imagine this soundtrack would b the best. we got so much awesome music these last few years by so many emerging artists. but we should probably go to this page to talk about the music

      http://alvin.wikia.com/wiki/Thread:16644#100

        Loading editor
    • DEmersonJMFM
      DEmersonJMFM removed this reply because:
      Off-topic (take to Thread:16644).
      12:39, September 11, 2015
      This reply has been removed
    • DEmersonJMFM
      DEmersonJMFM removed this reply because:
      Off-topic (take to Thread:16644).
      12:39, September 11, 2015
      This reply has been removed
    • DEmersonJMFM
      DEmersonJMFM removed this reply because:
      Off-topic (take to Thread:16644).
      12:39, September 11, 2015
      This reply has been removed
    • I thought trailer 2 would arrive by now. The movie is three months away and the only media we have is the teaser. I also expected a few movie-clips by now.

        Loading editor
    • Ngh93 wrote:
      I thought trailer 2 would arrive by now. The movie is three months away and the only media we have is the teaser. I also expected a few movie-clips by now.

      I totally agree with you. I thought so to! After all, they will release a book about the movie before the movie's release. Where's the trailer?

        Loading editor
    • Maybe they are creating it now.

        Loading editor
    • I hope so!

        Loading editor
    • You have no idea how happy I am about this movie!! Yay! ;)

        Loading editor
    • im very exsited for this film! its amazing! XD but they look a little strange 

        Loading editor
    • I like the film, but I'm feared that this might be the final installment of the movie series.

        Loading editor
    • Bigbrad wrote:
      I like the film, but I'm feared that this might be the final installment of the movie series.

      If it is the final installment, I just hope it's won't be a box office bomb. The first three films didn't do so well with critics in the first place, but they were still major successes at the box office. 

        Loading editor
    • I feared even sooner that this might be the final movie of the series. I really hope it doesn't end, but if it does, I want it to end on a positive and concluding note. 

        Loading editor
    • That's not what I'm worried about. In the UK trailer, Tony Hale as the villain said "Freeze!" and held up a badge as he said something I didn't hear correctly. What did he say while holding the badge? But the main thing I'm worried about is that the Chipmunks and the Chipettes will be on the run as shown in our first trailer. Tony Hale is shown finding them in that bar he gets thrown at the window. So either someone is going to die in the film, or the gang will be in a lot of trouble unless things cleat up.

        Loading editor
    • Bigbrad wrote:
       In the UK trailer, Tony Hale as the villain said "Freeze!" and held up a badge as he said something I didn't hear correctly. What did he say while holding the badge?

      i think he said "air marshal" - as in "a high rank officer in the RAF, above air vice-marshal and below air chief marshal") o: 

        Loading editor
    • Thank you, but aren't the Chipmunks and the Chipettes going to be on the run?

        Loading editor
    • All I know is they're taking a road trip to stop Dave from getting married and having the worst step-brother. 

      Also, yeah. I fully understood Tony Hale. "Freeze! Air Marshal."

        Loading editor
    • Plus, Tony Hale is a cop?

        Loading editor
    • Bigbrad what do you mean the chipmunks AND the chipettes are going to be on the run?

        Loading editor
    • well, in the first trailer, some guy that looks like Tony Hale got knocked out into a bar. In the second trailer, he said "Freeze! Air Marshall!" So it's possible that he would be like Ian Hawke and wants to eat the Chipmunks and Chipettes for dinner.

        Loading editor
    • Just a heads up, The Road Chip will now premiere Dec. 18th in the US, the same day as Star Wars.

        Loading editor
    • You saw the second trailer today of the US?

        Loading editor
    • I just saw it on Wikipedia. The people in charge of the film must think that releasing the film next to Star Wars will increase its popularity. It might work. 

        Loading editor
    • where's the link for the second us trailer does it include the girls? PLese yes? 

        Loading editor
    • But for it to be official, 20th Century Fox will have to make the second trailer in the US!

        Loading editor
    • Ngh93 wrote:
      where's the link for the second us trailer does it include the girls? PLese yes? 

      here's the second trailer :3 http://alvin.wikia.com/wiki/File:Alvin_and_the_Chipmunks_The_Road_Chip_Official_Trailer_2 

      it does show the girls at the end, but it's a clip from the squeakquel o:

        Loading editor
    • That's just the UK Trailer.

        Loading editor
    • @bigbrad 

      even if it is the uk trailer, it's still the same trailer :33 (FOX posted it to their US channel and it was the same!) 

        Loading editor
    • When they posted it?

        Loading editor
    • It's nearly November and we still don't know nothing else about the movie. Not as much as a movie clip or behind the scense featurette (that would explain a lot of details that the convuluated UK/AUS trailer isn't telling us--and they aren't even spoilers). ANd Just when I thought there was a REAL US trailer or even tv spots or movie clips, they still haven't shown. WHat else is there to the plot besides the Marraige prevention? WHat role do the Chipettes play now that we KNOW that they ARE appearing (just contriute something to the plot--especiallyu compared to Chipwrecked). What we need is tv spots, film clips and behind the scenes featurettes. Cause I know there is more to this plot than the marraige prevention. 

        Loading editor
    • This movie is going to suck.

        Loading editor
    • Why?

        Loading editor
    • 1. The film was hastily tossed together in order for it to be released in 2015, as it was supposed to come out a year from now.

      2. The marketing is doing a terrible job, with only two trailers, and all of the posters just re-use the art from the first film and throw sunglasses on them.

      3. The filmmakers got cocky, and decided that Star Wars wouldn't beat the - out of them during that weekend.

      4. The AATC live-action movies (with an exception to the first one, as it is somewhat tolerable) are extremely horrendous and should stop immediately.

        Loading editor
    • Yeah, but if it must stop, then the Road Chip must be the final movie in the series to prove that.

        Loading editor
    • Ngh93
      Ngh93 removed this reply because:
      rep;eat
      00:12, October 22, 2015
      This reply has been removed
    • Does anyone know of an updated plot? The Chipette's role in it, more details about TOny Hale? I know ther eis more to this movie than preventing Dave from getting Married and I thought We'd have more details by now. Please help I need an uptaded plot. There is MUCH MORE than Dave's marraige that's te plot. 

        Loading editor
    • Sjenx02 wrote:

      2. The marketing is doing a terrible job, with only two trailers, and all of the posters just re-use the art from the first film and throw sunglasses on them.

      4. The AATC live-action movies (with an exception to the first one, as it is somewhat tolerable) are extremely horrendous and should stop immediately.

      2. That's literally what they've done with all the movies. I agree it looks terrible, but it's not the posters for these movies have ever looked good. 

      4. Not even close. They're really nowhere near as bad as everyone makes them out to be. I've given them all a watch (several watches actually) and they're all great. At least in my opinion. It's fine that you don't like the movies, but to expect them to suddenly stop being made because of that is ridiculous. 

        Loading editor
    • Let's face the truth, Janice doesn't care that much anymore.

        Loading editor